From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dennis Dalessandro Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] IB/hfi1: Do not free hfi1 cdev parent structure early Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 14:45:32 -0400 Message-ID: <20160525184531.GA24021@phlsvsds.ph.intel.com> References: <20160519122318.22041.58871.stgit@scvm10.sc.intel.com> <20160519122642.22041.66203.stgit@scvm10.sc.intel.com> <20160519183100.GC26130@obsidianresearch.com> <20160524141756.GA17438@phlsvsds.ph.intel.com> <20160524172054.GC8037@obsidianresearch.com> <20160524193955.GA17130@phlsvsds.ph.intel.com> <20160524215105.GD7950@obsidianresearch.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160524215105.GD7950-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Jason Gunthorpe Cc: dledford-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Mitko Haralanov , Ira Weiny List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 03:51:05PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: >On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 03:39:56PM -0400, Dennis Dalessandro wrote: > >> >Yes, but there are clearly more problems. >> >> We may need other fixes I'll give you that, but is there a reason not to >> apply this particular patch? > >Nope, none at all, but my questions are all on the same topic - that >the cdev removal vs device removal is not robust. Yep, point taken. Looking into further patches. -Denny -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html