From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 23:11:10 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] package/xfsprogs: install in the same location as e2fsprogs In-Reply-To: <1464096676-41655-1-git-send-email-ckhardin@exablox.com> References: <1464096676-41655-1-git-send-email-ckhardin@exablox.com> Message-ID: <20160525231110.648f963a@free-electrons.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hello, On Tue, 24 May 2016 06:31:16 -0700, Charles Hardin wrote: > The configure script hard codes "/sbin" for installation which > installs the XFS tools in a different location then the e2fsprogs. > > This is just a cosmetic patch so all the tools end up in "/usr/sbin" > for consistency. > > Signed-off-by: Charles Hardin What is the motivation for this change? If the upstream xfsprogs developers think it should be installed in /sbin, why should we change it? In any case, the patch itself needs a description + your Signed-off-by line. Also, it should be submitted to the upstream xfsprogs developers to see if they might accept it. Otherwise I think we would prefer to keep the existing behavior. Thanks! Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com