From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161289AbcE3NL6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 May 2016 09:11:58 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:22535 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161029AbcE3NL4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 May 2016 09:11:56 -0400 Message-Id: <201605301311.u4UD9AqR024078@mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com> X-IBM-Helo: d23dlp03.au.ibm.com X-IBM-MailFrom: xyjxie@linux.vnet.ibm.com X-IBM-RcptTo: kvm@vger.kernel.org;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Yongji Xie To: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: alex.williamson@redhat.com, bhelgaas@google.com, aik@ozlabs.ru, benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au, warrier@linux.vnet.ibm.com, zhong@linux.vnet.ibm.com, nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com, gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com, kevin.tian@intel.com Subject: [PATCH v4] vfio-pci: Allow to mmap sub-page MMIO BARs if the mmio page is exclusive Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 21:06:37 +0800 X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.1 X-TM-AS-MML: disable X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 16053013-0020-0000-0000-000001AA4237 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 16053013-0021-0000-0000-000009C46E85 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:,, definitions=2016-05-30_06:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=8 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1604210000 definitions=main-1605300160 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Current vfio-pci implementation disallows to mmap sub-page(size < PAGE_SIZE) MMIO BARs because these BARs' mmio page may be shared with other BARs. This will cause some performance issues when we passthrough a PCI device with this kind of BARs. Guest will be not able to handle the mmio accesses to the BARs which leads to mmio emulations in host. However, not all sub-page BARs will share page with other BARs. We should allow to mmap the sub-page MMIO BARs which we can make sure will not share page with other BARs. This patch adds support for this case. And we try to add a dummy resource to reserve the remainder of the page which hot-add device's BAR might be assigned into. But it's not necessary to handle the case when the BAR is not page aligned. Because we can't expect the BAR will be assigned into the same location in a page in guest when we passthrough the BAR. And it's hard to access this BAR in userspace because we have no way to get the BAR's location in a page. Signed-off-by: Yongji Xie --- drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c | 87 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_private.h | 8 ++++ 2 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c index 188b1ff..3cca2a7 100644 --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c @@ -110,6 +110,73 @@ static inline bool vfio_pci_is_vga(struct pci_dev *pdev) return (pdev->class >> 8) == PCI_CLASS_DISPLAY_VGA; } +static void vfio_pci_probe_mmaps(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev) +{ + struct resource *res; + int bar; + struct vfio_pci_dummy_resource *dummy_res; + + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vdev->dummy_resources_list); + + for (bar = PCI_STD_RESOURCES; bar <= PCI_STD_RESOURCE_END; bar++) { + res = vdev->pdev->resource + bar; + + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VFIO_PCI_MMAP)) + goto no_mmap; + + if (!(res->flags & IORESOURCE_MEM)) + goto no_mmap; + + /* + * The PCI core shouldn't set up a resource with a + * type but zero size. But there may be bugs that + * cause us to do that. + */ + if (!resource_size(res)) + goto no_mmap; + + if (resource_size(res) >= PAGE_SIZE) { + vdev->bar_mmap_supported[bar] = true; + continue; + } + + if (!(res->start & ~PAGE_MASK)) { + /* + * Add a dummy resource to reserve the remainder + * of the exclusive page in case that hot-add + * device's bar is assigned into it. + */ + dummy_res = kzalloc(sizeof(*dummy_res), GFP_KERNEL); + if (dummy_res == NULL) + goto no_mmap; + + dummy_res->resource.start = res->end + 1; + dummy_res->resource.end = res->start + PAGE_SIZE - 1; + dummy_res->resource.flags = res->flags; + if (request_resource(res->parent, + &dummy_res->resource)) { + kfree(dummy_res); + goto no_mmap; + } + dummy_res->index = bar; + list_add(&dummy_res->res_next, + &vdev->dummy_resources_list); + vdev->bar_mmap_supported[bar] = true; + continue; + } + /* + * Here we don't handle the case when the BAR is not page + * aligned because we can't expect the BAR will be + * assigned into the same location in a page in guest + * when we passthrough the BAR. And it's hard to access + * this BAR in userspace because we have no way to get + * the BAR's location in a page. + */ +no_mmap: + vdev->bar_mmap_supported[bar] = false; + } +} + static void vfio_pci_try_bus_reset(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev); static void vfio_pci_disable(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev); @@ -218,12 +285,15 @@ static int vfio_pci_enable(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev) } } + vfio_pci_probe_mmaps(vdev); + return 0; } static void vfio_pci_disable(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev) { struct pci_dev *pdev = vdev->pdev; + struct vfio_pci_dummy_resource *dummy_res, *tmp; int i, bar; /* Stop the device from further DMA */ @@ -252,6 +322,13 @@ static void vfio_pci_disable(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev) vdev->barmap[bar] = NULL; } + list_for_each_entry_safe(dummy_res, tmp, + &vdev->dummy_resources_list, res_next) { + list_del(&dummy_res->res_next); + release_resource(&dummy_res->resource); + kfree(dummy_res); + } + vdev->needs_reset = true; /* @@ -623,9 +700,7 @@ static long vfio_pci_ioctl(void *device_data, info.flags = VFIO_REGION_INFO_FLAG_READ | VFIO_REGION_INFO_FLAG_WRITE; - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VFIO_PCI_MMAP) && - pci_resource_flags(pdev, info.index) & - IORESOURCE_MEM && info.size >= PAGE_SIZE) { + if (vdev->bar_mmap_supported[info.index]) { info.flags |= VFIO_REGION_INFO_FLAG_MMAP; if (info.index == vdev->msix_bar) { ret = msix_sparse_mmap_cap(vdev, &caps); @@ -1049,16 +1124,16 @@ static int vfio_pci_mmap(void *device_data, struct vm_area_struct *vma) return -EINVAL; if (index >= VFIO_PCI_ROM_REGION_INDEX) return -EINVAL; - if (!(pci_resource_flags(pdev, index) & IORESOURCE_MEM)) + if (!vdev->bar_mmap_supported[index]) return -EINVAL; - phys_len = pci_resource_len(pdev, index); + phys_len = PAGE_ALIGN(pci_resource_len(pdev, index)); req_len = vma->vm_end - vma->vm_start; pgoff = vma->vm_pgoff & ((1U << (VFIO_PCI_OFFSET_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)) - 1); req_start = pgoff << PAGE_SHIFT; - if (phys_len < PAGE_SIZE || req_start + req_len > phys_len) + if (req_start + req_len > phys_len) return -EINVAL; if (index == vdev->msix_bar) { diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_private.h b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_private.h index 016c14a..2128de8 100644 --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_private.h +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_private.h @@ -57,9 +57,16 @@ struct vfio_pci_region { u32 flags; }; +struct vfio_pci_dummy_resource { + struct resource resource; + int index; + struct list_head res_next; +}; + struct vfio_pci_device { struct pci_dev *pdev; void __iomem *barmap[PCI_STD_RESOURCE_END + 1]; + bool bar_mmap_supported[PCI_STD_RESOURCE_END + 1]; u8 *pci_config_map; u8 *vconfig; struct perm_bits *msi_perm; @@ -88,6 +95,7 @@ struct vfio_pci_device { int refcnt; struct eventfd_ctx *err_trigger; struct eventfd_ctx *req_trigger; + struct list_head dummy_resources_list; }; #define is_intx(vdev) (vdev->irq_type == VFIO_PCI_INTX_IRQ_INDEX) -- 1.7.9.5