From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758506AbcFAOc4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Jun 2016 10:32:56 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f68.google.com ([74.125.82.68]:32920 "EHLO mail-wm0-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754638AbcFAOcy (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Jun 2016 10:32:54 -0400 Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 16:32:50 +0200 From: Richard Cochran To: Jungseung Lee Cc: Thomas Gleixner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] posix-clock: remove unneeded posix_clock_compat_ioctl() Message-ID: <20160601143250.GA27032@localhost.localdomain> References: <1464771281-13248-1-git-send-email-js07.lee@samsung.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1464771281-13248-1-git-send-email-js07.lee@samsung.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 05:54:41PM +0900, Jungseung Lee wrote: > posix_clock_compat_ioctl() is identical to posix_clock_ioctl(). > We don't need additional compat_ioctl in this time. > Remove posix_clock_compat_ioctl() and let posix_clock_ioctl() is in charge. Did you test this patch? Did you run a 32 program using the ioctl on a 64 bit kernel? Thanks, Richard