From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753117AbcFFOLr (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jun 2016 10:11:47 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.136]:50696 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752855AbcFFOLq (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jun 2016 10:11:46 -0400 Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2016 11:11:40 -0300 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Andi Kleen Cc: Andi Kleen , Jiri Olsa , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] perf stat: Basic support for TopDown in perf stat Message-ID: <20160606141140.GB31477@kernel.org> References: <1464119559-17203-1-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org> <20160530160155.GQ8857@kernel.org> <20160530160402.GI22049@tassilo.jf.intel.com> <20160530161942.GD11853@kernel.org> <20160606140003.GD8679@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160606140003.GD8679@kernel.org> X-Url: http://acmel.wordpress.com User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Em Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 11:00:03AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu: > The kernel patches are in tip/perf/core now, so I applied the patches > and they seem to work, but they broke one 'perf test' entry: > # perf test -v 5 > > running test 50 '4:0x6530160/name=numpmu/' > running test 51 'L1-dcache-misses/name=cachepmu/' > running test 0 'cpu/config=10,config1,config2=3,period=1000/u' > running test 1 'cpu/config=1,name=krava/u,cpu/config=2/u' > running test 2 'cpu/config=1,call-graph=fp,time,period=100000/,cpu/config=2,call-graph=no,time=0,period=2000/' > Invalid sysfs entry event=topdown-recovery-bubbles.scale > failed to parse event 'cpu/event=topdown-recovery-bubbles.scale/u', err 1 > test child finished with 1 > ---- end ---- > parse events tests: FAILED! > # Ok, the test failure is not due to this patchkit, the reason are the new topdown*.scale files in the kernel, was there a patch to handle that that is missing in my branch? - Arnaldo