From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] pinctrl: sh-pfc: add r8a7795 support for voltage switching Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 13:12:00 +0200 Message-ID: <20160610111200.GB1626@katana> References: <1465229307-1961-1-git-send-email-wsa@the-dreams.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZfOjI3PrQbgiZnxM" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-renesas-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org --ZfOjI3PrQbgiZnxM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline > BTW, are these a hard dependency for patch 3, or will the missing power > source control just be ignored? Long answer short: It is a hard dependency. It shouldn't be, but fixing this might need patches to pfc, mmc-core, and sdhi driver. Need to think about it. (and even then, patch 3 will be depending on these yet-to-come fixes). --ZfOjI3PrQbgiZnxM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJXWqCAAAoJEBQN5MwUoCm2HcwQAJYqYzf8zCx5brUXHooneq0f r6U0aXouZRiSSDI8D79J2gNyTHounQ/hq288Dr958s0fIxTYcF8vGpPL7RA7uFRN MGpkpl2L/iv/CkoYG3CtafUmdXywVCu52I0PT0LSV5Yx7ZkJYPn3B2lSUGQj9LhK tknOEfntxWrowRXm/tGZR3zKaGnfErgQO+0ksMyuPbVeY5xyNSWBO3vpjo4UCo2B JrGt05Pj6i7ndXNIJ1b0gGICshJBEjUvZvqPPU+JgC1BXzjA4Ud8kyphAk3b4eUr 7T9xYU9B1it7MSF5aZ5Dqu3oTPBzyV15lCKpzjxGqS0J3QH1fx7XXQWEprpEdfRG 6pXggf5eEdckvY6nRQG5zPwZK9w1Qm4gsYmI0RdS+/YdJ45VqM6SxmuT2apnm0nz KoHhElEITSXPzEwfe+9Bbmr31rGWbaFrhqrawLMUVzOsD0/o793kXWbnFMOUgO5F WjPDUyCkIhri3wzOvcVl9owSwJG/j9W5dccZZw15s3ofAYo/c+F6k2sdrg+qRUZU sFJHG8v974IfDb+6Elaa/o7h+80ENsk8+zVc3XipwQl5/MlaSFtES15Ss0awequU M+hFZz4A5hFbTGyKiotrsvlJwA8qvj5XykJyG4UpFcEnQOWd25oAOX9ykZ2Ptyrq fM2doNF/p5Xl9V/yitlm =6l97 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ZfOjI3PrQbgiZnxM--