From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49128) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bBS2e-0005dp-4D for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 15:24:29 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bBS2a-0006x4-SZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 15:24:28 -0400 Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:44333) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bBS2Y-0006pb-GG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 15:24:24 -0400 Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 15:24:12 -0400 From: "Emilio G. Cota" Message-ID: <20160610192412.GA22607@flamenco> References: <20160610163432.GA22231@flamenco> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 00/15] tb hash improvements List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: Richard Henderson , QEMU Developers On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 17:41:26 +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 10 June 2016 at 17:34, Emilio G. Cota wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 16:33:10 +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > >> Fails to build on ppc64be :-( > >> > >> In file included from /home/pm215/qemu/include/qemu/thread.h:4:0, > >> from /home/pm215/qemu/include/block/aio.h:20, > >> from /home/pm215/qemu/include/block/block.h:4, > >> from /home/pm215/qemu/include/monitor/monitor.h:6, > >> from /home/pm215/qemu/trace/control.c:23: > >> /home/pm215/qemu/include/qemu/processor.h:24:35: error: expected > >> identifier or ‘(’ before string constant > >> "or 2, 2, 2;" ::: "memory") > > > > On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 16:57:19 +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > >> Also fails trying to build a test on 32-bit: > >> > >> /home/petmay01/qemu/tests/qht-bench.c: In function 'pr_params': > >> /home/petmay01/qemu/tests/qht-bench.c:270:5: error: format '%zu' > >> expects argument of type 'size_t', but argument 2 has type 'long > >> unsigned int' [-Werror=format=] > >> printf(" lookup range: %zu\n", lookup_range); > > > > Can you please test again after applying the appended delta? > > I will test. > > For the PPC asm, is it not just wanting the "\n" between instructions? > Shouldn't be necessary to use two separate asm() lines... I can't test on ppc so I was just being paranoid to avoid wasting your time :-) E.