From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: yunhong jiang Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH V2 2/4] Utilize the vmx preemption timer Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 09:46:06 -0700 Message-ID: <20160614094606.3fc0ed03@jnakajim-build> References: <1464128852-14138-1-git-send-email-yunhong.jiang@linux.intel.com> <1464128852-14138-3-git-send-email-yunhong.jiang@linux.intel.com> <20160614125537.b3qlcjytjb64ezht@rkaganb.sw.ru> <27f8a049-4e8f-27fd-8fe2-6121f6218f25@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Roman Kagan , kvm@vger.kernel.org, mtosatti@redhat.com, rkrcmar@redhat.com, kernellwp@gmail.com To: Paolo Bonzini Return-path: Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:54914 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751727AbcFNQux (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Jun 2016 12:50:53 -0400 In-Reply-To: <27f8a049-4e8f-27fd-8fe2-6121f6218f25@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 15:41:07 +0200 Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > On 14/06/2016 15:23, Roman Kagan wrote: > >> > > >> > +static int cpu_preemption_timer_multi; > >> > +static bool __read_mostly enable_hv_timer; > >> > +module_param_named(enable_hv_timer, enable_hv_timer, bool, > >> > S_IRUGO); + > > Non-techincal issue: I think the naming for the parameter is > > unfortunate, as it looks similar to a number of CPU properties in > > QEMU that start with "hv-", which are all related to MS Hyper-V > > compatibility features. > > Non-technical but important. Let's change it to preemption_timer (and > the variable to enable_preemption_timer). > > The code can keep the "hv_timer" moniker though. Hi, Paolo, should I resend the patch for this change? Thanks --jyh > > Paolo