From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751897AbcFNMyV (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Jun 2016 08:54:21 -0400 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:36279 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751647AbcFNMyT (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Jun 2016 08:54:19 -0400 Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 14:54:12 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Juri Lelli Cc: mingo@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, rostedt@goodmis.org, xlpang@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, jdesfossez@efficios.com, bristot@redhat.com, Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/8] rtmutex: Deboost before waking up the top waiter Message-ID: <20160614125412.GI30921@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20160607195635.710022345@infradead.org> <20160607200215.637804442@infradead.org> <20160614090934.GE5981@e106622-lin> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160614090934.GE5981@e106622-lin> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 10:09:34AM +0100, Juri Lelli wrote: > I've got only nitpicks for the changelog. Otherwise the patch looks good > to me (and yes, without it bw inheritance would be a problem). So for bw inheritance I'm still not sure how to dead with the faxt that the top_pi_waiter, while blocked, can still be running, spin waiting.