All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
To: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Abdul Haleem <abdhalee@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Aneesh Kumar <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] workqueue: Move wq_update_unbound_numa() to the beginning of CPU_ONLINE
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 15:35:04 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160616193504.GB3262@mtj.duckdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160615192844.GA20301@in.ibm.com>

Hello,

So, the issue of the initial worker not having its affinity set
correctly wasn't caused by the order of the operations.  Reordering
just made set_cpus_allowed tried one more time late enough so that it
hides the race condition most of the time.  The problem is that
CPU_ONLINE callbacks are called while the cpu being onlined is online
but not active and select_fallback_rq() only considers active cpus, so
if a kthread gets scheduled in the meantime and it doesn't have any
cpu which is active in its allowed mask, it's allowed mask gets reset
to cpu_possible_mask.

Would something like the following make sense?

Thanks.
------ 8< ------
Subject: [PATCH] sched: allow kthreads to fallback to online && !active cpus

During CPU hotplug, CPU_ONLINE callbacks are run while the CPU is
online but not active.  A CPU_ONLINE callback may create or bind a
kthread so that its cpus_allowed mask only allows the CPU which is
being brought online.  The kthread may start executing before the CPU
is made active and can end up in select_fallback_rq().

In such cases, the expected behavior is selecting the CPU which is
coming online; however, because select_fallback_rq() only chooses from
active CPUs, it determines that the task doesn't have any viable CPU
in its allowed mask and ends up overriding it to cpu_possible_mask.

CPU_ONLINE callbacks should be able to put kthreads on the CPU which
is coming online.  Update select_fallback_rq() so that it follows
cpu_online() rather than cpu_active() for kthreads.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reported-by: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 kernel/sched/core.c |    4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 017d539..a12e3db 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -1536,7 +1536,9 @@ static int select_fallback_rq(int cpu, struct task_struct *p)
 	for (;;) {
 		/* Any allowed, online CPU? */
 		for_each_cpu(dest_cpu, tsk_cpus_allowed(p)) {
-			if (!cpu_active(dest_cpu))
+			if (!(p->flags & PF_KTHREAD) && !cpu_active(dest_cpu))
+				continue;
+			if (!cpu_online(dest_cpu))
 				continue;
 			goto out;
 		}

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-16 19:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-19 10:57 WARNING at kernel/sched/core.c:1166 while booting 4.6.0 mainline on ppc64le bare metal abdhalee
2016-05-19 12:34 ` Gavin Shan
2016-05-26 15:11 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2016-06-07 12:29   ` Abdul Haleem
2016-06-07 15:14     ` [PATCH 0/2] Fix CPU Online handling for unbounded worker threads Gautham R. Shenoy
2016-06-07 15:14       ` [PATCH 1/2] workqueue: Move wq_update_unbound_numa() to the beginning of CPU_ONLINE Gautham R. Shenoy
2016-06-15 15:53         ` Tejun Heo
2016-06-15 19:28           ` Gautham R Shenoy
2016-06-16 19:35             ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2016-06-21 14:12               ` Gautham R Shenoy
2016-06-21 15:36                 ` Tejun Heo
2016-06-21 19:37                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-21 19:43                     ` Tejun Heo
2016-06-21 19:47                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-22  5:15                         ` Gautham R Shenoy
2016-06-24  9:00               ` [tip:sched/urgent] sched/core: Allow kthreads to fall back to online && !active cpus tip-bot for Tejun Heo
2016-06-07 15:14       ` [PATCH 2/2] workqueue:Fix affinity of an unbound worker of a node with 1 online CPU Gautham R. Shenoy
2016-06-08  6:03         ` Abdul Haleem
2016-06-14 11:22         ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-15 10:19           ` Gautham R Shenoy
2016-06-15 11:32             ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-15 12:50               ` Gautham R Shenoy
2016-06-15 13:14                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-15 16:01                   ` Tejun Heo
2016-06-16 12:11                     ` Michael Ellerman
2016-06-16 12:45                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-16 19:39                         ` Tejun Heo
2016-06-17  1:49                           ` Michael Ellerman
2016-07-15  5:27                           ` Gautham R Shenoy
2016-07-15  5:30                           ` Michael Ellerman
     [not found]                           ` <57887507.911f240a.687de.08c5SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
2016-07-15 12:10                             ` Tejun Heo
2016-06-13  5:44       ` [PATCH 0/2] Fix CPU Online handling for unbounded worker threads Gautham R Shenoy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160616193504.GB3262@mtj.duckdns.org \
    --to=htejun@gmail.com \
    --cc=abdhalee@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.