From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:47329 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752796AbcFQPGz (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Jun 2016 11:06:55 -0400 Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 08:06:55 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Brian Foster Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, vishal.l.verma@intel.com, xfs@oss.sgi.com, "Darrick J. Wong" Subject: Re: [PATCH 002/119] vfs: support FS_XFLAG_REFLINK and FS_XFLAG_COWEXTSIZE Message-ID: <20160617150654.GA21627@infradead.org> References: <146612627129.12839.3827886950949809165.stgit@birch.djwong.org> <146612628567.12839.3246258786290141903.stgit@birch.djwong.org> <20160617114117.GF19042@infradead.org> <20160617121604.GB23661@bfoster.bfoster> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160617121604.GB23661@bfoster.bfoster> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 08:16:05AM -0400, Brian Foster wrote: > I'd take that a step further and suggest the entire series be split into > independent feature series, as appropriate. Yes, that's what I meant. I just didn't manage to get to the rest yet. > off the rmap bits for the time being. I'm just suggesting that if a > repost is required from this point forward for any of the logical > subunits (deps, rmap, reflink, scrub), I'd suggest to post, version and > changelog those units independently. Agreed. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C88D7CD2 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 10:07:01 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CF80304048 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 08:06:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id nNAxiZnZr16SVwAT (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 08:06:56 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 08:06:55 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 002/119] vfs: support FS_XFLAG_REFLINK and FS_XFLAG_COWEXTSIZE Message-ID: <20160617150654.GA21627@infradead.org> References: <146612627129.12839.3827886950949809165.stgit@birch.djwong.org> <146612628567.12839.3246258786290141903.stgit@birch.djwong.org> <20160617114117.GF19042@infradead.org> <20160617121604.GB23661@bfoster.bfoster> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160617121604.GB23661@bfoster.bfoster> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Brian Foster Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com, "Darrick J. Wong" , vishal.l.verma@intel.com On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 08:16:05AM -0400, Brian Foster wrote: > I'd take that a step further and suggest the entire series be split into > independent feature series, as appropriate. Yes, that's what I meant. I just didn't manage to get to the rest yet. > off the rmap bits for the time being. I'm just suggesting that if a > repost is required from this point forward for any of the logical > subunits (deps, rmap, reflink, scrub), I'd suggest to post, version and > changelog those units independently. Agreed. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs