All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>,
	Benjamin Segall <bsegall@google.com>,
	Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>,
	Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
	Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] sched,fair: Fix PELT integrity for new tasks
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 19:15:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160623171511.GM30154@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <576C01DA.2050406@arm.com>

On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 04:35:54PM +0100, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
> > The things we ran into with these patches were that:
> > 
> >  1) You need to update the cfs_rq _before_ any entity attach/detach
> >     (and might need to update_tg_load_avg when update_cfs_rq_load_avg()
> >     returns true).
> > 
> >  2) (fair) entities are always attached, switched_from/to deal with !fair.
> > 
> >  3) cpu migration is the only exception and uses the last_update_time=0
> >     thing -- because refusal to take second rq->lock.
> 
> 2) is about changing sched classes, 3) is about changing cpus but what
> about 4) changing task groups?
> 
> There is still this last_update_time = 0 between
> detach_task_cfs_rq()/set_task_rq() and attach_task_cfs_rq() in
> task_move_group_fair() preventing the call __update_load_avg(...
> p->se->avg, ...) in attach_task_cfs_rq() -> attach_entity_load_avg().
> 
> Shouldn't be necessary any more since cfs_rq 'next' is up-to-date now.
> 
> Assuming here that the exception in 3) relates to the fact that the
> rq->lock is not taken.
> 
> Or is 4) a second exception in the sense that the se has been aged in
> remove_entity_load_avg() (3)) resp. detach_entity_load_avg() (4))?

Ah, good point, so move between groups is also special in that the time
between cgroups doesn't need to match.

And since we've aged the se to 'now' on detach, we can assume its
up-to-date (and hence last_update_time=0) for attach, which then only
updates its cfs_rq to 'now' before attaching the se.

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-23 17:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-17 12:01 [PATCH 0/4] sched/fair: Fix PELT wobblies Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-17 12:01 ` [PATCH 1/4] sched: Optimize fork() paths Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-17 12:01 ` [PATCH 2/4] sched/fair: Fix PELT integrity for new groups Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-17 13:51   ` Vincent Guittot
2016-06-17 12:01 ` [PATCH 3/4] sched,cgroup: Fix cpu_cgroup_fork() Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-17 13:58   ` Vincent Guittot
2016-06-17 14:06     ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-17 12:01 ` [PATCH 4/4] sched,fair: Fix PELT integrity for new tasks Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-17 14:09   ` Vincent Guittot
2016-06-17 14:28     ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-17 16:02       ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-17 16:14         ` Vincent Guittot
2016-06-17 16:18         ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-19 22:55           ` Yuyang Du
2016-06-20  9:23           ` Vincent Guittot
2016-06-20  9:52             ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-20 10:07               ` Vincent Guittot
2016-06-21 11:43             ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-21 12:36               ` Vincent Guittot
2016-06-21 12:47                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-21 12:56                   ` Vincent Guittot
2016-06-20 11:35           ` Dietmar Eggemann
2016-06-20 12:35             ` Vincent Guittot
2016-06-20 14:49               ` Dietmar Eggemann
2016-06-21  8:41                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-21  4:51                   ` Yuyang Du
2016-06-24 13:03                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-08-09 23:19                       ` Yuyang Du
2016-06-21 13:17                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-21 13:29                     ` Vincent Guittot
2016-06-22 11:46                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-23 15:35                   ` Dietmar Eggemann
2016-06-23 17:15                     ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2016-06-20 14:27             ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-23 11:19   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-08-01  7:30   ` Wanpeng Li
2016-08-01  9:31     ` Mike Galbraith
2016-08-01  9:56       ` Wanpeng Li
2016-08-01 11:52         ` Mike Galbraith

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160623171511.GM30154@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
    --cc=pjt@google.com \
    --cc=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=yuyang.du@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.