From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Herbert Xu Subject: Re: esp: Fix ESN generation under UDP encapsulation Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 09:52:51 +0800 Message-ID: <20160624015251.GB15308@gondor.apana.org.au> References: <20160620105934.GL7698@gauss.secunet.com> <576B64B1.9030000@alliedtelesis.co.nz> <20160623104007.GO7698@gauss.secunet.com> <20160623.115245.451201603985254809.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: steffen.klassert@secunet.com, Blair.Steven@alliedtelesis.co.nz, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from helcar.hengli.com.au ([209.40.204.226]:45779 "EHLO helcar.hengli.com.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750847AbcFXBxA (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jun 2016 21:53:00 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160623.115245.451201603985254809.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 11:52:45AM -0400, David Miller wrote: > > Does the ipv6 side need the same fix? Last I checked IPv6 didn't do IPsec UDP-encapsulation so we're safe for now. Cheers, -- Email: Herbert Xu Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt