All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
To: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org, kwolf@redhat.com,
	stefanha@redhat.com, Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>,
	Ronnie Sahlberg <ronniesahlberg@gmail.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Peter Lieven <pl@kamp.de>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 17/22] block: Switch discard length bounds to byte-based
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 14:43:10 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160624064310.GC13266@ad.usersys.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1466721446-27737-18-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com>

On Thu, 06/23 16:37, Eric Blake wrote:
> Sector-based limits are awkward to think about; in our on-going
> quest to move to byte-based interfaces, convert max_discard and
> discard_alignment.  Rename them, using 'pdiscard' as an aid to
> track which remaining discard interfaces need conversion, and so
> that the compiler will help us catch the change in semantics
> across any rebased code.  The BlockLimits type is now completely
> byte-based; and in iscsi.c, sector_limits_lun2qemu() is no
> longer needed.
> 
> pdiscard_alignment is made unsigned (we use power-of-2 alignments
> as bitmasks, where unsigned is easier to think about) while
> leaving max_pdiscard signed (since we still have an 'int'
> interface); this is comparable to what commit cf081fc did for
> write zeroes limits.  We may later want to make everything an
> unsigned 64-bit limit - but that requires a bigger code audit.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
> 
> ---
> v3: split out write_zeroes wording tweaks, improve commit message
> v2: rebase nbd and iscsi limits across earlier improvements
> ---
>  include/block/block_int.h | 14 ++++++++++----
>  block/io.c                | 16 +++++++++-------
>  block/iscsi.c             | 19 ++++++-------------
>  block/nbd.c               |  2 +-
>  qemu-img.c                |  3 ++-
>  5 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/block/block_int.h b/include/block/block_int.h
> index 7a4a00f..388ef80 100644
> --- a/include/block/block_int.h
> +++ b/include/block/block_int.h
> @@ -324,11 +324,17 @@ struct BlockDriver {
>  };
> 
>  typedef struct BlockLimits {
> -    /* maximum number of sectors that can be discarded at once */
> -    int max_discard;
> +    /* maximum number of bytes that can be discarded at once (since it
> +     * is signed, it must be < 2G, if set), should be multiple of
> +     * pdiscard_alignment, but need not be power of 2. May be 0 if no
> +     * inherent 32-bit limit */
> +    int32_t max_pdiscard;
> 
> -    /* optimal alignment for discard requests in sectors */
> -    int64_t discard_alignment;
> +    /* optimal alignment for discard requests in bytes, must be power
> +     * of 2, less than max_discard if that is set, and multiple of

s/max_discard/max_pdiscard/

> +     * bs->request_alignment. May be 0 if bs->request_alignment is
> +     * good enough */
> +    uint32_t pdiscard_alignment;
> 
>      /* maximum number of bytes that can zeroized at once (since it is
>       * signed, it must be < 2G, if set), should be multiple of
> diff --git a/block/io.c b/block/io.c
> index 8ca9d43..0f15d05 100644
> --- a/block/io.c
> +++ b/block/io.c
> @@ -2368,19 +2368,21 @@ int coroutine_fn bdrv_co_discard(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t sector_num,
>          goto out;
>      }
> 
> -    max_discard = MIN_NON_ZERO(bs->bl.max_discard, BDRV_REQUEST_MAX_SECTORS);
> +    max_discard = MIN_NON_ZERO(bs->bl.max_pdiscard >> BDRV_SECTOR_BITS,
> +                               BDRV_REQUEST_MAX_SECTORS);
>      while (nb_sectors > 0) {
>          int ret;
>          int num = nb_sectors;
> +        int discard_alignment = bs->bl.pdiscard_alignment >> BDRV_SECTOR_BITS;
> 
>          /* align request */
> -        if (bs->bl.discard_alignment &&
> -            num >= bs->bl.discard_alignment &&
> -            sector_num % bs->bl.discard_alignment) {
> -            if (num > bs->bl.discard_alignment) {
> -                num = bs->bl.discard_alignment;
> +        if (discard_alignment &&
> +            num >= discard_alignment &&
> +            sector_num % discard_alignment) {
> +            if (num > discard_alignment) {
> +                num = discard_alignment;
>              }
> -            num -= sector_num % bs->bl.discard_alignment;
> +            num -= sector_num % discard_alignment;

Or just

               num = discard_alignment - sector_num % discard_alignment;

without the if.

Otherwise looks good,

Reviewed-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>

>          }
> 
>          /* limit request size */
> diff --git a/block/iscsi.c b/block/iscsi.c
> index 368687d..0d16c31 100644
> --- a/block/iscsi.c
> +++ b/block/iscsi.c
> @@ -1696,13 +1696,6 @@ static void iscsi_close(BlockDriverState *bs)
>      memset(iscsilun, 0, sizeof(IscsiLun));
>  }
> 
> -static int sector_limits_lun2qemu(int64_t sector, IscsiLun *iscsilun)
> -{
> -    int limit = MIN(sector_lun2qemu(sector, iscsilun), INT_MAX / 2 + 1);
> -
> -    return limit < BDRV_REQUEST_MAX_SECTORS ? limit : 0;
> -}
> -
>  static void iscsi_refresh_limits(BlockDriverState *bs, Error **errp)
>  {
>      /* We don't actually refresh here, but just return data queried in
> @@ -1722,14 +1715,14 @@ static void iscsi_refresh_limits(BlockDriverState *bs, Error **errp)
>      }
> 
>      if (iscsilun->lbp.lbpu) {
> -        if (iscsilun->bl.max_unmap < 0xffffffff) {
> -            bs->bl.max_discard =
> -                sector_limits_lun2qemu(iscsilun->bl.max_unmap, iscsilun);
> +        if (iscsilun->bl.max_unmap < 0xffffffff / iscsilun->block_size) {
> +            bs->bl.max_pdiscard =
> +                iscsilun->bl.max_unmap * iscsilun->block_size;
>          }
> -        bs->bl.discard_alignment =
> -            sector_limits_lun2qemu(iscsilun->bl.opt_unmap_gran, iscsilun);
> +        bs->bl.pdiscard_alignment =
> +            iscsilun->bl.opt_unmap_gran * iscsilun->block_size;
>      } else {
> -        bs->bl.discard_alignment = iscsilun->block_size >> BDRV_SECTOR_BITS;
> +        bs->bl.pdiscard_alignment = iscsilun->block_size;
>      }
> 
>      if (iscsilun->bl.max_ws_len < 0xffffffff / iscsilun->block_size) {

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-24  6:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-23 22:37 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 00/22] Byte-based block limits Eric Blake
2016-06-23 22:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 01/22] block: Tighter assertions on bdrv_aligned_pwritev() Eric Blake
2016-06-23 22:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 02/22] block: Document supported flags during bdrv_aligned_preadv() Eric Blake
2016-06-23 22:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 03/22] block: Fix harmless off-by-one in bdrv_aligned_preadv() Eric Blake
2016-06-23 22:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 04/22] nbd: Allow larger requests Eric Blake
2016-06-23 22:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 05/22] nbd: Advertise realistic limits to block layer Eric Blake
2016-06-23 22:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 06/22] iscsi: " Eric Blake
2016-06-23 22:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 07/22] scsi: Advertise limits by blocksize, not 512 Eric Blake
2016-06-24  5:22   ` Fam Zheng
2016-06-23 22:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 08/22] block: Give nonzero result to blk_get_max_transfer_length() Eric Blake
2016-06-24  5:24   ` Fam Zheng
2016-06-23 22:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 09/22] blkdebug: Set request_alignment during .bdrv_refresh_limits() Eric Blake
2016-06-24  5:42   ` Fam Zheng
2016-06-23 22:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 10/22] iscsi: " Eric Blake
2016-06-23 22:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 11/22] qcow2: " Eric Blake
2016-06-23 22:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 12/22] raw-win32: " Eric Blake
2016-06-23 22:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 13/22] block: " Eric Blake
2016-06-23 22:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 14/22] block: Set default request_alignment during bdrv_refresh_limits() Eric Blake
2016-06-23 22:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 15/22] block: Switch transfer length bounds to byte-based Eric Blake
2016-06-24  6:06   ` Fam Zheng
2016-06-23 22:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 16/22] block: Wording tweaks to write zeroes limits Eric Blake
2016-06-24  6:12   ` Fam Zheng
2016-06-24 14:10     ` Eric Blake
2016-06-23 22:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 17/22] block: Switch discard length bounds to byte-based Eric Blake
2016-06-24  6:43   ` Fam Zheng [this message]
2016-06-24 14:15     ` Eric Blake
2016-06-24 14:29       ` Kevin Wolf
2016-06-23 22:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 18/22] block: Drop raw_refresh_limits() Eric Blake
2016-06-24  6:44   ` Fam Zheng
2016-06-23 22:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 19/22] block: Split bdrv_merge_limits() from bdrv_refresh_limits() Eric Blake
2016-06-24  6:48   ` Fam Zheng
2016-06-23 22:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 20/22] block: Move request_alignment into BlockLimit Eric Blake
2016-06-24  7:07   ` Fam Zheng
2016-06-24 13:45   ` Kevin Wolf
2016-06-24 14:17     ` Eric Blake
2016-06-23 22:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 21/22] block: Fix error message style Eric Blake
2016-06-24  7:09   ` Fam Zheng
2016-06-23 22:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 22/22] block: Use bool as appropriate for BDS members Eric Blake
2016-06-24  7:12   ` Fam Zheng
2016-06-24 14:32 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 00/22] Byte-based block limits Kevin Wolf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160624064310.GC13266@ad.usersys.redhat.com \
    --to=famz@redhat.com \
    --cc=eblake@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=pl@kamp.de \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=ronniesahlberg@gmail.com \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.