On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 09:26:38PM +0000, Hefty, Sean wrote:
> > The fundamental question is if it is acceptable for libibverbs to ship
> > a new core provider agnostic API (cq polling) that is optional
> > depending on provider.
> > 
> > I say no, that is not acceptable.
> 
> I agree - there's no compelling argument that the new calls can't work over all providers.

I agree too, this is why code is provided and nothing stops from other provider to support it.