From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S932129AbcGCSoc (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Sun, 3 Jul 2016 14:44:32 -0400
Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([78.46.96.112]:41731 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1752843AbcGCSo2 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sun, 3 Jul 2016 14:44:28 -0400
Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2016 20:44:18 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
        X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>, "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
        stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] x86: fix duplicated X86_BUG(9) macro
Message-ID: <20160703184418.GC1781@pd.tnic>
References: <20160701001209.7DA24D1C@viggo.jf.intel.com>
 <20160701001210.AA77B917@viggo.jf.intel.com>
 <20160701092300.GD4593@pd.tnic>
 <CALCETrV+uq4fcgmUK_u6_Tu6Ex3FrYM0fQjDbjwy5KZ8f8OuHg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20160701164656.GG4593@pd.tnic>
 <CALCETrXXTijS0pbd2n9Rh_1AMsaerbGxC06mDmXoYm8rCDKpvg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrXXTijS0pbd2n9Rh_1AMsaerbGxC06mDmXoYm8rCDKpvg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Sun, Jul 03, 2016 at 07:36:30AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> Dunno.  ESPFIX was broken under KVM for years and no one notices.

Ah, so this really was the case already. :-\

> We could do that, too, I guess.  But the current solution is only two
> extra lines of code.  We could reorder the things so that it's in the
> middle instead of at the end, I suppose.

Yeah, sounds good. Especially if it was already broken - I missed that
fact.

Thanks.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.