From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Oleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru>
Cc: Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"<linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: More parallel atomic_open/d_splice_alias fun with NFS and possibly more FSes.
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2016 04:20:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160706032055.GQ14480@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6188A470-DF7F-44CE-89F0-117EC2FA1677@linuxhacker.ru>
On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 08:29:37PM -0400, Oleg Drokin wrote:
> > + /* Otherwise we just unhash it to be rehashed afresh via
> > + * lookup if necessary
> > + */
> > + d_drop(dentry);
>
> So we can even drop this part and retain the top condition as it was.
> d_add does not care if the dentry we are feeding it was hashed or not,
> so do you see any downsides to doing that I wonder?
d_add() on hashed dentry will end up reaching this:
static void __d_rehash(struct dentry * entry, struct hlist_bl_head *b)
{
BUG_ON(!d_unhashed(entry));
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-06 3:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-17 4:09 More parallel atomic_open/d_splice_alias fun with NFS and possibly more FSes Oleg Drokin
2016-06-17 4:29 ` Al Viro
2016-06-25 16:38 ` Oleg Drokin
2016-07-03 6:29 ` Al Viro
2016-07-04 0:08 ` Al Viro
2016-07-04 0:37 ` Oleg Drokin
2016-07-04 0:37 ` Oleg Drokin
2016-07-04 3:08 ` Al Viro
2016-07-04 3:55 ` Oleg Drokin
2016-07-04 3:55 ` Oleg Drokin
2016-07-05 2:25 ` Al Viro
2016-07-10 17:01 ` Oleg Drokin
2016-07-10 18:14 ` James Simmons
2016-07-11 1:01 ` Al Viro
2016-07-11 1:03 ` Al Viro
2016-07-11 22:54 ` lustre sendmsg stuff Oleg Drokin
2016-07-11 17:15 ` More parallel atomic_open/d_splice_alias fun with NFS and possibly more FSes James Simmons
2016-07-05 2:28 ` Oleg Drokin
2016-07-05 2:32 ` Oleg Drokin
2016-07-05 4:43 ` Oleg Drokin
2016-07-05 6:22 ` Oleg Drokin
2016-07-05 12:31 ` Al Viro
2016-07-05 13:51 ` Al Viro
2016-07-05 15:21 ` Oleg Drokin
2016-07-05 17:42 ` Al Viro
2016-07-05 18:12 ` Oleg Drokin
2016-07-05 16:33 ` Oleg Drokin
2016-07-05 18:08 ` Al Viro
2016-07-05 19:12 ` Oleg Drokin
2016-07-05 20:08 ` Al Viro
2016-07-05 20:21 ` Oleg Drokin
2016-07-06 0:29 ` Oleg Drokin
2016-07-06 3:20 ` Al Viro [this message]
2016-07-06 3:25 ` Oleg Drokin
2016-07-06 3:25 ` Oleg Drokin
2016-07-06 4:35 ` Oleg Drokin
2016-07-06 4:35 ` Oleg Drokin
2016-07-06 16:24 ` Oleg Drokin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160706032055.GQ14480@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=green@linuxhacker.ru \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.