From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C69971 for ; Fri, 15 Jul 2016 00:22:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0EE54192 for ; Fri, 15 Jul 2016 00:22:30 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 09:22:39 +0900 From: Greg KH To: Mark Brown Message-ID: <20160715002239.GA31603@kroah.com> References: <1468114447.2333.12.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <1468115770.2333.15.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <718BE1FD-6169-4205-A905-53F997D5943A@primarydata.com> <5785C80F.4030707@linaro.org> <20160713090739.GA18037@kroah.com> <20160713143447.GH9976@sirena.org.uk> <20160714031753.GA28722@kroah.com> <20160714100603.GJ9976@sirena.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160714100603.GJ9976@sirena.org.uk> Cc: James Bottomley , "ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" , Trond Myklebust Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [CORE TOPIC] kernel unit testing List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 11:06:03AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 12:17:53PM +0900, Greg KH wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 03:34:47PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > There was a lot of pushback against LTSI, > > > pushback from whom? > > Linaro members who wanted the LSK. Ok, there's no need for everyone to use the same messy tree, but perhaps Linaro could participate with LTSI to help make something that more people can all use? No need to keep duplicating the same work... But this is way off-topic here, sorry. greg k-h