Re: [PATCH] blame: Allow to blame paths freshly added to the index

[Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org>]

On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 08:37:59AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 09:32:45PM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote:
> 
> > > > +test_expect_success 'blame wholesale copy and more in the index' '
> > > > +
> > > > +	{
> > > > +		echo ABC
> > > > +		echo DEF
> > > > +		echo XXXX
> > > > +		echo YYYY
> > > > +		echo GHIJK
> > > > +	} >horse &&
> > > 
> > > A more common way to do this in our test scripts is by using here
> > > documents. However, in this case I would suggest
> > > 
> > > 	test_write_lines ABC DEF XXXX YYYY GHIJK >horse
> > 
> > I merely copied the pattern used in other places in the same test file.
> > Using test_write_lines or something else (what are "here documents"?)
> > would break consistency. I can also change the other similar blocks at
> > the same time, though, whichever you prefer.
> 
> A here document is this:
> 
>    cat <<-\EOF
>    ABC
>    DEF
>    XXXX
>    YYYY
>    GHIJK
>    EOF
> 
> The "<<" starts the here-doc. The "-" tells the shell to strip leading
> tabs (so you can keep it indented with the rest of the code. The "\"
> tells the shell not to interpolate (not a big deal here, but great for
> more complicated input). The "EOF" tells it where to stop.

Oh, so that's what they are called! I've used them for 20 years
without knowing :) TIL.

Mike