From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:52106 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751320AbcGSD6p (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Jul 2016 23:58:45 -0400 Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 20:58:43 -0700 From: "hch@infradead.org" To: Trond Myklebust Cc: "hch@infradead.org" , "linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 24/28] NFS: Getattr doesn't require data sync semantics Message-ID: <20160719035843.GA24437@infradead.org> References: <1467844205-76852-19-git-send-email-trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> <1467844205-76852-20-git-send-email-trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> <1467844205-76852-21-git-send-email-trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> <1467844205-76852-22-git-send-email-trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> <1467844205-76852-23-git-send-email-trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> <1467844205-76852-24-git-send-email-trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> <1467844205-76852-25-git-send-email-trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> <20160718034847.GA1195@infradead.org> <1468817945.5273.2.camel@primarydata.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1468817945.5273.2.camel@primarydata.com> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 04:59:09AM +0000, Trond Myklebust wrote: > Actually... The problem might be that a previous attribute update is > marking the attribute cache as being revalidated. Does the following > patch help? It doesn't. Also with your most recent linux-next branch the test now cause the systems to OOM with or without your patch (with mine it's still fine). I tested with your writeback branch from about two or three days ago before, and with that + your patch it also 'just fails' and doesn't OOM. Looks like whatever causes the bug also creates a temporarily memory leak when combined with recent changes from your tree, most likely something from the pnfs branch.