From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9EAED8D7 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 07:18:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx2.suse.de (mx2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A38C148 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 07:18:44 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 09:18:40 +0200 From: Jan Kara To: Davidlohr Bueso Message-ID: <20160728071840.GB4094@quack2.suse.cz> References: <20160727232054.GA30998@linux-80c1.suse> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160727232054.GA30998@linux-80c1.suse> Cc: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] self nomination List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi! On Wed 27-07-16 16:20:54, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > In addition, I'm wondering if there's any interest in a performance > session (getting to know some of the bottlenecks that are currently > making folks cry), like Chris Mason has been doing in past kernel > summits for fb specific workloads. I'd be interested in that session. But we need to find enough content. We can certainly talk about our experiences with updating kernel for SLE12 SP2 (to 4.4) but I don't think it would fill the whole session. So it would be good if other "vendors" shared their experiences as well. Honza -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR