On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 03:40:31PM +0200, LABBE Corentin wrote: > On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 09:55:19AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 10:03:18AM +0200, LABBE Corentin wrote: > > > This patch adds documentation for Device-Tree bindings for the > > > Allwinner sun8i-emac driver. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: LABBE Corentin > > > --- > > > .../bindings/net/allwinner,sun8i-emac.txt | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > 1 file changed, 65 insertions(+) > > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/allwinner,sun8i-emac.txt > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/allwinner,sun8i-emac.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/allwinner,sun8i-emac.txt > > > new file mode 100644 > > > index 0000000..4bf4e53 > > > --- /dev/null > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/allwinner,sun8i-emac.txt > > > @@ -0,0 +1,65 @@ > > > +* Allwinner sun8i EMAC ethernet controller > > > + > > > +Required properties: > > > +- compatible: "allwinner,sun8i-a83t-emac", "allwinner,sun8i-h3-emac", > > > + or "allwinner,sun50i-a64-emac" > > > +- reg: address and length of the register sets for the device. > > > +- reg-names: should be "emac" and "syscon", matching the register sets > > > > Blindly mapping a register of some other device on the SoC doesn't > > look very reasonable. > > As we discuss after this mail on IRC, this register is dedicated to EMAC. I don't think we did. It's still right in the middle of some other hardware block register space. You actually have a syscon driver to do just that, why not use it? > > > +See ethernet.txt in the same directory for generic bindings for ethernet > > > +controllers. > > > + > > > +The device node referenced by "phy" or "phy-handle" should be a child node > > > +of this node. See phy.txt for the generic PHY bindings. > > > + > > > +Optional properties: > > > +- phy-supply: phandle to a regulator if the PHY needs one > > > +- phy-io-supply: phandle to a regulator if the PHY needs a another one for I/O. > > > + This is sometimes found with RGMII PHYs, which use a second > > > + regulator for the lower I/O voltage. > > > +- allwinner,tx-delay: The setting of the TX clock delay chain > > > +- allwinner,rx-delay: The setting of the RX clock delay chain > > > > In which unit? What is the default value? > > The unit is unknown to me, but I have added a comment for the > default and acceptable range value. That's unfortunate. We'll see how the DT maintainers feel about that. Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com