On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 05:34:50PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 07/28/2016 11:28 AM, Mark Brown wrote:

> > TBH if that's all it's doing then I'm surprised it's not simple to
> > handle it with irq_setup_generic_chip() - have you looked at that at
> > all?

> The generic IRQ chip model assumes that the mask/unmask/ack logic will
> operate against the same register base address, which won't be the case
> for the NS/NSP/NS2 platforms where the mask/unmask is in one register
> set (coined IDM), and the ack is in another one (actually 7 * 32-bits
> words).

I'd been thinking of just implementing an irqchip with no masking in it
- the source level masking isn't really a part of the irqchip itself
here any more than it is when it's a real irqchip that's attached.