From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752223AbcG2QH4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Jul 2016 12:07:56 -0400 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:33589 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751563AbcG2QHx (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Jul 2016 12:07:53 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,440,1464678000"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="1031584356" Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2016 21:45:21 +0530 From: Vinod Koul To: Mark Brown Cc: Nicolin Chen , lgirdwood@gmail.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, bardliao@realtek.com, oder_chiou@realtek.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Darren Hart Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: rt5659: Add mclk controls Message-ID: <20160729161521.GL9681@localhost> References: <1469660568-3511-1-git-send-email-nicoleotsuka@gmail.com> <20160728155732.GG11806@sirena.org.uk> <20160728181419.GA4742@Asurada-Nvidia> <20160728185510.GK11806@sirena.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="+jhVVhN62yS6hEJ8" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160728185510.GK11806@sirena.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --+jhVVhN62yS6hEJ8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 07:55:10PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 11:14:20AM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 04:57:32PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: >=20 > > > This device seems to be used on x86 systems so we'll need to ensure t= hat > > > they register clocks for this. They really should set this up using > > > quirks keyed off DMI information or similar so it's hidden from other > > > systems. >=20 > > Hmm..the change defines this mclk as a optional property so I'm > > not sure how it would affect x86 systems. (Would love to refine >=20 > Ah, clk_prepare_enable() silently ignores NULL as an argument? It is a > bit messy to do things that way but might be the most practical thing. >=20 > > it to make it impactless.) Since it's literally hidden, any way > > that I can manually ensure it? Or just wait for an ack from x86 > > developers? >=20 > Hopefully they'll speak up - we're in the merge window anyway so it'll > be just over a week before this can go into -next. Yeah I am not aware of any plan to have clks on x86. For audio we are not going to use much. ACPI and controller w/ firmware does the job. I have added Darren, he oversee platform things so might know if clocks would be there in future.. Thanks --=20 ~Vinod --+jhVVhN62yS6hEJ8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJXm4EYAAoJEHwUBw8lI4NHyKAQAJKbJjjg/5TkhnsomEV11g7H WP5n9T/fPVtjEK3GMxzGmuhxmHmZ3IlqGVGM9wkyd5eqFRi1JhFcHn64/kzG8Kg1 NvoRCY+OBFuej1/FEVQCe1W1xMby190T5GgufJIVxICqbV0cAv3/7imzBzoesayv k1yLfXCeZqkUbjnSEphiQjxkXEEqlQi2meehkMDW2+r1ktF5A4eVztfLis5PpkNo Admol6L2sIudpjrF7l3nh6cu/hypPuSAGhgnoHcF2y3hBznLuOz3Gtnqo2Na0dWV s8ysxQnAZuUrlcZz43ElbH1l4vh6+P6ABgyxQZQ02AbXNNqvPxvbbwxGQBAofCRk WN5a1cjZ/HofOKUoH4OqKFtyvd1wd9qFamaaFvl+U8aAhafzsnlIYP7iwbkOeKQj hzBvO8joy8YgO7qV0HUfhV/cxn+QDySedjRjTNIQwTPmOWmHnb+TfGinojjG8e8w XJKtp0HSrkOYBoN1oqMsuzaRG2ILR1Vu1qvYcaK5BQBTl38xNJIraoCojbG3rh/a 6NGrPAlIfhBqKQ/o5Ddk+Xi2tDU4GkFXioCU5k97kn401YecrSMNGjAokxFXtir3 pfdZT34+da+W6JNUyYRoI0Rnuj5rQMDKqx2nLX3jwT7EbY678MMSfTBBQfnKHXiV 48bxTNWD6jQYPE8jZbSB =U1cq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --+jhVVhN62yS6hEJ8--