On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 12:06:52PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:

> Well, I don't think there's any answer to that. But I still think it's
> better than nothing. If nobody has the hardware, do we ever care if it
> gets tested? ;-)

I think it'd be better to split such tests out so that there's a clear
distinction between those that we can tell should run reliably and those
that have some hardware dependency.  That way people who just want a
predicatable testsuite without worrying if there's something wrong in
the environment can get one.