From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp2.linuxfoundation.org (smtp2.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.36]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BED7B2C for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2016 03:04:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtprelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0043.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.43]) by smtp2.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BC0F1DABC for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2016 03:04:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtprelay.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by smtpgrave04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93141B0EAF for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2016 02:45:21 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2016 22:45:17 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: David Herrmann Message-ID: <20160729224517.380a644f@grimm.local.home> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH TOPIC] Bus IPC List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, 29 Jul 2016 00:24:03 +0200 David Herrmann wrote: > o Steven Rostedt Count me in too. And thanks, at the surface, this looks like a much improved implementation over kdbus. -- Steve