From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A84E83D for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2016 22:21:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay2-d.mail.gandi.net (relay2-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.194]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D99CCFB for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2016 22:21:07 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2016 15:21:00 -0700 From: Josh Triplett To: David Herrmann Message-ID: <20160730222100.6me2tt54w3e234wu@x> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Cc: "ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH TOPIC] Bus IPC List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 12:24:03AM +0200, David Herrmann wrote: > Tom Gundersen and I would like to propose a technical session on > in-kernel IPC systems. For roughly half a year now we have been > developing (with others) a capability-based [1] IPC system for linux, > called bus1 [2]. We would like to present bus1, start a discussion on > open problems, and talk about the possible path forward for an upstream > inclusion. > > While bus1 emerged out of the kdbus project, it is a new, independent > project, designed from scratch. I'd heard that the plan for bus1 was to provide DBus-compatible semantics via a userspace compatibility layer. Do you still plan to do that, so that current users of DBus can run on bus1 without modification, or will current users of DBus need to port to bus1? - Josh Triplett