From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752913AbcHAWLG (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Aug 2016 18:11:06 -0400 Received: from bh-25.webhostbox.net ([208.91.199.152]:33665 "EHLO bh-25.webhostbox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752621AbcHAWK6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Aug 2016 18:10:58 -0400 Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2016 14:23:12 -0700 From: Guenter Roeck To: "Levin, Alexander" Cc: =?utf-8?B?6ZmI5Y2O5omN?= , stable , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: mips builds failing in v3.18.38 and v4.1.29 Message-ID: <20160801212312.GA18005@roeck-us.net> References: <579E905E.3000706@roeck-us.net> <20160801152941.GA6287@roeck-us.net> <84814064-9b38-5be5-37c9-987668d10a00@verizon.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <84814064-9b38-5be5-37c9-987668d10a00@verizon.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Authenticated_sender: guenter@roeck-us.net X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - bh-25.webhostbox.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - vger.kernel.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - roeck-us.net X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: bh-25.webhostbox.net: authenticated_id: guenter@roeck-us.net X-Authenticated-Sender: bh-25.webhostbox.net: guenter@roeck-us.net X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 11:37:31AM -0400, Levin, Alexander wrote: > On 08/01/2016 11:29 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > Hi Sasha, > > > > On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 10:58:31AM -0400, Levin, Alexander wrote: > > [ ... ] > >>> > >>> Offending commit is 1dd0964204277108e ("MIPS: Reserve nosave data for hibernation"). > >>> It fixes a bug which does not exist in 3.18 / 4.1, in turn causing all mips builds in 3.18 > >>> and 4.1 to fail. > >>> > >>> Guenter > >>> > >> > >> I'm sorry, it mush have gotten lost in the email switch. I'll revert > >> that commit for the next stable release and hurry that up. > >> > > > > It would be great if you can also address the sparc64 problem > > I reported in my second e-mail. > > Yup, I reverted that commit as well. > > > Any chance you can add linux@roeck-us.net to your release candidate > > announcement e-mails ? This would help making sure that I don't miss > > a release. > > I actually talked with Greg about it a while back and decided to stop > doing "release candidates" because I never ended up getting any reports > on those. I keep getting lots of feedback on the "Added to the x.y > stable kernel" mails so I rely on those for now. > If you didn't get feedback from me, it was because I never got those e-mails ;-). > I'll add that mail to the cover letter I send out when I do those, which > is essentially equivalent (and actually gives more time) if that sounds > ok to you. > Sure, that would help. Thanks, Guenter