All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Cc: david@fromorbit.com, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
	fstests@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/17] xfs: run xfs_repair at the end of each test
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 17:15:42 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160803091542.GM27776@eguan.usersys.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <146914481474.11762.2741429828012981240.stgit@birch.djwong.org>

On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 04:46:54PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> Run xfs_repair twice at the end of each test -- once to rebuild
> the btree indices, and again with -n to check the rebuild work.

Seems like it's two more xfs_repair, three in total :)

> 
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> ---
>  README    |    4 ++++
>  common/rc |   30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 34 insertions(+)
> 
> 
> diff --git a/README b/README
> index 2647e12..4509cc1 100644
> --- a/README
> +++ b/README
> @@ -80,6 +80,10 @@ Preparing system for tests (IRIX and Linux):
>                 added to the end of fsstresss and fsx invocations, respectively,
>                 in case you wish to exclude certain operational modes from these
>                 tests.
> +             - set TEST_XFS_REPAIR_REBUILD=1 to have _check_xfs_filesystem
> +               run xfs_repair -n to check the filesystem; xfs_repair to rebuild
> +               metadata indexes; and xfs_repair -n (a third time) to check the
> +               results of the rebuilding.
>  
>          - or add a case to the switch in common/config assigning
>            these variables based on the hostname of your test
> diff --git a/common/rc b/common/rc
> index 7c79bf8..3b45578 100644
> --- a/common/rc
> +++ b/common/rc
> @@ -2428,6 +2428,36 @@ _check_xfs_filesystem()
>          ok=0
>      fi
>  
> +    if [ -n "$TEST_XFS_REPAIR_REBUILD" ]; then
> +        $XFS_REPAIR_PROG -n $extra_options $extra_log_options $extra_rt_options $device >$tmp.repair 2>&1
> +        if [ $? -ne 0 ]
> +        then
> +            echo "_check_xfs_filesystem: filesystem on $device is inconsistent (r) (see $seqres.full)"
> +
> +            echo "_check_xfs_filesystem: filesystem on $device is inconsistent" >>$seqres.full
> +            echo "*** xfs_repair -n output ***"	>>$seqres.full
> +            cat $tmp.repair | _fix_malloc		>>$seqres.full
> +            echo "*** end xfs_repair output"	>>$seqres.full
> +
> +            ok=0
> +        fi
> +        rm -f $tmp.fs_check $tmp.logprint $tmp.repair
> +
> +        $XFS_REPAIR_PROG $extra_options $extra_log_options $extra_rt_options $device >$tmp.repair 2>&1
> +        if [ $? -ne 0 ]
> +        then
> +            echo "_check_xfs_filesystem: filesystem on $device is inconsistent (r) (see $seqres.full)"
> +
> +            echo "_check_xfs_filesystem: filesystem on $device is inconsistent" >>$seqres.full
> +            echo "*** xfs_repair -n output ***"	>>$seqres.full
> +            cat $tmp.repair | _fix_malloc		>>$seqres.full
> +            echo "*** end xfs_repair output"	>>$seqres.full
> +
> +            ok=0
> +        fi
> +        rm -f $tmp.fs_check $tmp.logprint $tmp.repair
> +    fi
> +

I think we can move this hunk after the original xfs_repair and swap the
xfs_repair order, i.e.

xfs_repair -n # this is the original repair check
if <check_rebuild>; then
	xfs_repair # do rebuild without -n
	xfs_repair -n # check rebuild result
fi

This seems more clear to me and we can mark which repair is failing more
easily (right now the three xfs_repairs are all marked as "(r)", it's
hard to say which one is failing), e.g.

xfs_repair -n # marked as "(r)", means "repair"
if <check_rebuild>; then
	xfs_repair # mark as "(rb)", means "rebuild"?
	xfs_repair -n # mark as "(rr)", means "repair rebuild"?
fi

Thanks,
Eryu

>      $XFS_REPAIR_PROG -n $extra_options $extra_log_options $extra_rt_options $device >$tmp.repair 2>&1
>      if [ $? -ne 0 ]
>      then
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/17] xfs: run xfs_repair at the end of each test
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 17:15:42 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160803091542.GM27776@eguan.usersys.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <146914481474.11762.2741429828012981240.stgit@birch.djwong.org>

On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 04:46:54PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> Run xfs_repair twice at the end of each test -- once to rebuild
> the btree indices, and again with -n to check the rebuild work.

Seems like it's two more xfs_repair, three in total :)

> 
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> ---
>  README    |    4 ++++
>  common/rc |   30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 34 insertions(+)
> 
> 
> diff --git a/README b/README
> index 2647e12..4509cc1 100644
> --- a/README
> +++ b/README
> @@ -80,6 +80,10 @@ Preparing system for tests (IRIX and Linux):
>                 added to the end of fsstresss and fsx invocations, respectively,
>                 in case you wish to exclude certain operational modes from these
>                 tests.
> +             - set TEST_XFS_REPAIR_REBUILD=1 to have _check_xfs_filesystem
> +               run xfs_repair -n to check the filesystem; xfs_repair to rebuild
> +               metadata indexes; and xfs_repair -n (a third time) to check the
> +               results of the rebuilding.
>  
>          - or add a case to the switch in common/config assigning
>            these variables based on the hostname of your test
> diff --git a/common/rc b/common/rc
> index 7c79bf8..3b45578 100644
> --- a/common/rc
> +++ b/common/rc
> @@ -2428,6 +2428,36 @@ _check_xfs_filesystem()
>          ok=0
>      fi
>  
> +    if [ -n "$TEST_XFS_REPAIR_REBUILD" ]; then
> +        $XFS_REPAIR_PROG -n $extra_options $extra_log_options $extra_rt_options $device >$tmp.repair 2>&1
> +        if [ $? -ne 0 ]
> +        then
> +            echo "_check_xfs_filesystem: filesystem on $device is inconsistent (r) (see $seqres.full)"
> +
> +            echo "_check_xfs_filesystem: filesystem on $device is inconsistent" >>$seqres.full
> +            echo "*** xfs_repair -n output ***"	>>$seqres.full
> +            cat $tmp.repair | _fix_malloc		>>$seqres.full
> +            echo "*** end xfs_repair output"	>>$seqres.full
> +
> +            ok=0
> +        fi
> +        rm -f $tmp.fs_check $tmp.logprint $tmp.repair
> +
> +        $XFS_REPAIR_PROG $extra_options $extra_log_options $extra_rt_options $device >$tmp.repair 2>&1
> +        if [ $? -ne 0 ]
> +        then
> +            echo "_check_xfs_filesystem: filesystem on $device is inconsistent (r) (see $seqres.full)"
> +
> +            echo "_check_xfs_filesystem: filesystem on $device is inconsistent" >>$seqres.full
> +            echo "*** xfs_repair -n output ***"	>>$seqres.full
> +            cat $tmp.repair | _fix_malloc		>>$seqres.full
> +            echo "*** end xfs_repair output"	>>$seqres.full
> +
> +            ok=0
> +        fi
> +        rm -f $tmp.fs_check $tmp.logprint $tmp.repair
> +    fi
> +

I think we can move this hunk after the original xfs_repair and swap the
xfs_repair order, i.e.

xfs_repair -n # this is the original repair check
if <check_rebuild>; then
	xfs_repair # do rebuild without -n
	xfs_repair -n # check rebuild result
fi

This seems more clear to me and we can mark which repair is failing more
easily (right now the three xfs_repairs are all marked as "(r)", it's
hard to say which one is failing), e.g.

xfs_repair -n # marked as "(r)", means "repair"
if <check_rebuild>; then
	xfs_repair # mark as "(rb)", means "rebuild"?
	xfs_repair -n # mark as "(rr)", means "repair rebuild"?
fi

Thanks,
Eryu

>      $XFS_REPAIR_PROG -n $extra_options $extra_log_options $extra_rt_options $device >$tmp.repair 2>&1
>      if [ $? -ne 0 ]
>      then
> 

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-08-03  9:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 112+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-07-21 23:46 [PATCH v7 00/17] xfstests: fixes and new tests for rmap/reflink/etc Darrick J. Wong
2016-07-21 23:46 ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-07-21 23:46 ` [PATCH 01/17] xfs/26[34]: remove duplicate tests Darrick J. Wong
2016-07-21 23:46   ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-08-01  6:25   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-01  6:25     ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-07-21 23:46 ` [PATCH 02/17] xfs: use rmapbt-checking helper Darrick J. Wong
2016-07-21 23:46   ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-08-01  6:25   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-01  6:25     ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-07-21 23:46 ` [PATCH 03/17] xfs/310: fix the size calculation for the huge device Darrick J. Wong
2016-07-21 23:46   ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-08-01  6:25   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-01  6:25     ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-07-21 23:46 ` [PATCH 04/17] xfs/122: list the new log redo items Darrick J. Wong
2016-07-21 23:46   ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-08-01  6:26   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-01  6:26     ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-07-21 23:46 ` [PATCH 05/17] common/reflink: actually test dedupe on scratch device Darrick J. Wong
2016-07-21 23:46   ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-08-01  6:26   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-01  6:26     ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-07-21 23:46 ` [PATCH 06/17] xfs: run xfs_repair at the end of each test Darrick J. Wong
2016-07-21 23:46   ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-08-01  6:27   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-01  6:27     ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-01 17:08     ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-08-01 17:08       ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-08-02 12:24       ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-02 12:24         ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-03  9:15   ` Eryu Guan [this message]
2016-08-03  9:15     ` Eryu Guan
2016-08-03 22:08     ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-08-03 22:08       ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-08-03 22:45   ` [PATCH v2 06/17] xfs: optionally test xfs_repair index rebuilding " Darrick J. Wong
2016-08-03 22:45     ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-07-21 23:47 ` [PATCH 07/17] xfs/128: cycle_mount the scratch device, not the test device Darrick J. Wong
2016-07-21 23:47   ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-08-01  6:27   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-01  6:27     ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-03  9:37   ` Eryu Guan
2016-08-03  9:37     ` Eryu Guan
2016-08-03 22:09     ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-08-03 22:09       ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-08-03 22:48   ` [PATCH v2 " Darrick J. Wong
2016-08-03 22:48     ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-07-21 23:47 ` [PATCH 08/17] xfs/129: fix post-metadump remounting idiocy Darrick J. Wong
2016-07-21 23:47   ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-08-01  6:27   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-01  6:27     ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-07-21 23:47 ` [PATCH 09/17] common/dmerror: fix mount option issues Darrick J. Wong
2016-07-21 23:47   ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-08-01  6:28   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-01  6:28     ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-03 10:38   ` Eryu Guan
2016-08-03 10:38     ` Eryu Guan
2016-08-03 22:14     ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-08-03 22:14       ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-08-03 22:50   ` [PATCH v2 " Darrick J. Wong
2016-08-03 22:50     ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-08-04  0:33     ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-08-04  0:33       ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-08-04  0:34   ` [PATCH v3 " Darrick J. Wong
2016-08-04  0:34     ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-07-21 23:47 ` [PATCH 10/17] xfs/179: use scratch device helpers Darrick J. Wong
2016-07-21 23:47   ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-08-01  6:28   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-01  6:28     ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-07-21 23:47 ` [PATCH 11/17] xfs/234: " Darrick J. Wong
2016-07-21 23:47   ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-08-01  6:29   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-01  6:29     ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-07-21 23:47 ` [PATCH 12/17] reflink: test cross-mountpoint reflink and dedupe Darrick J. Wong
2016-07-21 23:47   ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-08-01  6:29   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-01  6:29     ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-08  7:56   ` Eryu Guan
2016-08-08  7:56     ` Eryu Guan
2016-08-08 17:28     ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-08-08 17:28       ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-07-21 23:47 ` [PATCH 13/17] xfs: test swapext with reflink Darrick J. Wong
2016-07-21 23:47   ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-08-08  8:13   ` Eryu Guan
2016-08-08  8:13     ` Eryu Guan
2016-08-08 17:41     ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-08-08 17:41       ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-08-09  6:29       ` Dave Chinner
2016-08-09  6:29         ` Dave Chinner
2016-08-19 21:53         ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-08-19 21:53           ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-07-21 23:47 ` [PATCH 14/17] xfs: more rmapbt tests Darrick J. Wong
2016-07-21 23:47   ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-08-08  8:48   ` Eryu Guan
2016-08-08  8:48     ` Eryu Guan
2016-08-08 17:59     ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-08-08 17:59       ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-07-21 23:47 ` [PATCH 15/17] xfs: scrub fs (if still mounted) at the end of the test Darrick J. Wong
2016-07-21 23:47   ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-08-08  8:52   ` Eryu Guan
2016-08-08  8:52     ` Eryu Guan
2016-08-08 18:03     ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-08-08 18:03       ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-07-21 23:48 ` [PATCH 16/17] xfs/122: add the realtime rmapbt inode and btree fields Darrick J. Wong
2016-07-21 23:48   ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-08-01  6:30   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-01  6:30     ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-07-21 23:48 ` [PATCH 17/17] xfs: test realtime rmapbt code Darrick J. Wong
2016-07-21 23:48   ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-08-08  9:08   ` Eryu Guan
2016-08-08  9:08     ` Eryu Guan
2016-08-08 18:18     ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-08-08 18:18       ` Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160803091542.GM27776@eguan.usersys.redhat.com \
    --to=eguan@redhat.com \
    --cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.