From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: russell@coker.com.au (Russell Coker)
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 12:33:21 +1000
Subject: [refpolicy] [PATCH] single binary modutils
In-Reply-To: <64191a41-447c-83ab-dfab-2fcaa1275356@ieee.org>
References: <20160731123441.dcfgg3ln6z7u43f3@athena.coker.com.au>
	<64191a41-447c-83ab-dfab-2fcaa1275356@ieee.org>
Message-ID: <201608031233.21247.russell@coker.com.au>
To: refpolicy@oss.tresys.com
List-Id: refpolicy.oss.tresys.com

On Wed, 3 Aug 2016 09:59:28 AM Chris PeBenito wrote:
> On 07/31/16 08:34, Russell Coker wrote:
> > The following patch deals with a single binary for modutils, so depmod_t,
> > and insmod_t are merged.
> 
> Since the main SELinux distros (including RHEL/CentOS 7) all have merged 
> modutils these days, I'm open to taking a patch that fully merges these 
> domains (in which case renaming to kmod_t, with proper aliasing seems 
> the best idea).

OK.

> However, it's been some time since I used a busybox-based system; does 
> busybox still have separated tools?  Yes, this is a bit of an obvious 
> question since busybox is also single-binary, but IIRC, the embedded 
> guys made some tiny helper scripts or executables so proper 
> transitioning could occur.  Separate domains may still make sense.

Maybe have an ifdef(`embedded' or something around it then?

-- 
My Main Blog         http://etbe.coker.com.au/
My Documents Blog    http://doc.coker.com.au/