From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:49703 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758292AbcHCTpi (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Aug 2016 15:45:38 -0400 Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 12:45:36 -0700 From: Mark Fasheh To: "Darrick J. Wong" Cc: david@fromorbit.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, vishal.l.verma@intel.com, bfoster@redhat.com, xfs@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/47] xfs: add reverse mapping support Message-ID: <20160803194536.GJ5316@wotan.suse.de> Reply-To: Mark Fasheh References: <146907695530.25461.3225785294902719773.stgit@birch.djwong.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <146907695530.25461.3225785294902719773.stgit@birch.djwong.org> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Darrick, On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 09:55:55PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > Hi all, > > This is the seventh revision of a patchset that adds to XFS kernel > support for tracking reverse-mappings of physical blocks to file and > metadata (rmap). Per reviewers' request with v6, I am splitting the > gigantic patchbombs into separate functional areas. Given the > significant amount of design assumptions that change with block > sharing, rmap and reflink are provided together. There shouldn't be > any incompatible on-disk format changes, pending a thorough review of > the patches within. Where can I the patches to enable dedupe_range on xfs? I tested your previous devel branch based on Linux v4.7-rc3 with duperemove (https://github.com/markfasheh/duperemove) and it worked extremely well - even handling some cases that btrfs still has issues with. I actually committed the code to enable xfs support in duperemove so anyone can test on xfs with the dedupe_range patches. I'd gladly test your latest patches by doing my usual 'large' duperemove tests once I can get ahold of the dedupe_range work :) Thanks, --Mark -- Mark Fasheh From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83F4D7CA1 for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 14:45:42 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4007F304048 for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 12:45:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx2.suse.de (mx2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 1QCep0oLcpFXrI8Q (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 03 Aug 2016 12:45:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 12:45:36 -0700 From: Mark Fasheh Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/47] xfs: add reverse mapping support Message-ID: <20160803194536.GJ5316@wotan.suse.de> References: <146907695530.25461.3225785294902719773.stgit@birch.djwong.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <146907695530.25461.3225785294902719773.stgit@birch.djwong.org> Reply-To: Mark Fasheh List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: "Darrick J. Wong" Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, vishal.l.verma@intel.com, bfoster@redhat.com, xfs@oss.sgi.com Hi Darrick, On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 09:55:55PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > Hi all, > > This is the seventh revision of a patchset that adds to XFS kernel > support for tracking reverse-mappings of physical blocks to file and > metadata (rmap). Per reviewers' request with v6, I am splitting the > gigantic patchbombs into separate functional areas. Given the > significant amount of design assumptions that change with block > sharing, rmap and reflink are provided together. There shouldn't be > any incompatible on-disk format changes, pending a thorough review of > the patches within. Where can I the patches to enable dedupe_range on xfs? I tested your previous devel branch based on Linux v4.7-rc3 with duperemove (https://github.com/markfasheh/duperemove) and it worked extremely well - even handling some cases that btrfs still has issues with. I actually committed the code to enable xfs support in duperemove so anyone can test on xfs with the dedupe_range patches. I'd gladly test your latest patches by doing my usual 'large' duperemove tests once I can get ahold of the dedupe_range work :) Thanks, --Mark -- Mark Fasheh _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs