On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 02:37:36PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 8:03 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > > Sure, I don't think anyone disagrees on that but it does mean we don't > > actually blow up easily like we used to - it's messy but it does get > > there safely. I was specifically querying your statement that things > > would blow up. > Some drivers/subsystems don't support deferred probing yet. Such failures > usually don't blow up, but cause subtle malfunctioning. Sure, but at this point these are pretty much just bugs - it's one of the most common error patterns I see in probe routines but it does tend to go along with poor "let's just ignore that error, it can't have been important" practices which ought to be fixed anyway.