From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Daniel Micay <danielmicay@gmail.com>
Cc: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Jeff Vander Stoep <jeffv@google.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
"linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Subject: Re: [kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCH 1/2] security, perf: allow further restriction of perf_event_open
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2016 17:55:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160804155523.GO6879@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1470325468.22643.95.camel@gmail.com>
On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 11:44:28AM -0400, Daniel Micay wrote:
> This feature doesn't come from Android. The perf events subsystem in the
> mainline kernel is packed full of vulnerabilities too.
Uhh, not so much. I spend a _lot_ of time a while back to get the core
and x86 solid. I could run the fuzzers for hours on end at some point.
> The problem is so bad that pointing one of the public fuzzers at it
> for a short period of time is all that's required to start finding
> them.
If you know of any that reproduce on x86 I'll go fix. For anything else
you need to complain elsewhere as I don't have hardware nor bandwidth.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-04 15:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-27 14:45 [PATCH 1/2] security, perf: allow further restriction of perf_event_open Jeff Vander Stoep
2016-07-27 14:45 ` [kernel-hardening] " Jeff Vander Stoep
2016-07-27 20:43 ` Kees Cook
2016-07-27 20:43 ` Kees Cook
2016-08-02 9:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-08-02 9:52 ` [kernel-hardening] " Peter Zijlstra
2016-08-02 13:04 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-08-02 13:04 ` [kernel-hardening] " Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-08-02 13:10 ` Daniel Micay
2016-08-02 13:16 ` Daniel Micay
2016-08-02 19:04 ` Kees Cook
2016-08-02 19:04 ` Kees Cook
2016-08-02 20:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-08-02 20:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-08-02 20:51 ` Kees Cook
2016-08-02 20:51 ` Kees Cook
2016-08-02 21:06 ` Jeffrey Vander Stoep
2016-08-03 8:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-08-03 8:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-08-03 12:28 ` Daniel Micay
2016-08-03 12:53 ` Daniel Micay
2016-08-03 13:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-08-03 14:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-08-03 14:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-08-03 15:42 ` Schaufler, Casey
2016-08-03 15:42 ` Schaufler, Casey
2016-08-03 17:25 ` Eric W. Biederman
2016-08-03 17:25 ` Eric W. Biederman
2016-08-03 18:53 ` Kees Cook
2016-08-03 18:53 ` Kees Cook
2016-08-03 21:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-08-03 21:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-08-04 2:50 ` Eric W. Biederman
2016-08-04 2:50 ` Eric W. Biederman
2016-08-04 9:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-08-04 9:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-08-04 15:13 ` Eric W. Biederman
2016-08-04 15:13 ` Eric W. Biederman
2016-08-04 15:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-08-04 15:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-08-03 19:36 ` Daniel Micay
2016-08-04 10:28 ` Mark Rutland
2016-08-04 13:45 ` Daniel Micay
2016-08-04 14:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-08-04 15:44 ` Daniel Micay
2016-08-04 15:55 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2016-08-04 16:10 ` Mark Rutland
2016-08-04 16:32 ` Daniel Micay
2016-08-04 17:09 ` Mark Rutland
2016-08-04 17:36 ` Daniel Micay
2016-08-02 21:16 ` Jeffrey Vander Stoep
2016-08-02 21:16 ` Jeffrey Vander Stoep
2016-10-17 13:44 ` [kernel-hardening] " Mark Rutland
2016-10-17 14:54 ` Daniel Micay
2016-10-19 9:41 ` Mark Rutland
2016-10-19 15:16 ` Daniel Micay
2016-10-18 20:48 ` Kees Cook
2016-10-18 20:48 ` Kees Cook
2016-10-18 21:15 ` Daniel Micay
2016-10-19 9:56 ` Mark Rutland
2016-10-19 10:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-10-19 10:26 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-10-19 10:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-10-19 15:39 ` Daniel Micay
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160804155523.GO6879@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=danielmicay@gmail.com \
--cc=jeffv@google.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.