From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB72D98B for ; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 23:07:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E5AC133 for ; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 23:07:17 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2016 02:07:15 +0300 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" To: Catalin Marinas Message-ID: <20160805020118-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <20160729075039.GA26402@x> <30809.1469794812@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <20160729131151.GF4340@x> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Cc: "ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [ANNOUNCE] git-series: track changes to a patch series over time List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 12:46:47AM +0200, Catalin Marinas wrote: > On 29 Jul 2016, at 15:12, Josh Triplett wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 01:20:12PM +0100, David Howells wrote: > >> Josh Triplett wrote: > >>> I'd like to announce a project I've been working on for a while. I sent > >>> this announcement to LKML, but since many people don't subscribe to LKML > >>> directly, and since ksummit-discuss has had several discussions > >>> specifically about patch workflow and development processes, I thought > >>> I'd send the announcement here as well, in case anyone found it useful > >>> for their workflow. > >> > >> Can this be used as a direct substitute for stgit for maintaining a patch > >> series? > > > > Yes, that's exactly what I designed it for. git-series has the added > > advantage of tracking the versions of the patch series across rewrites. > > stgit just directly rewrites history, like rebase -i does; as far as I > > know, it doesn't remember the old history. You'd have to go to the > > reflog for that. > > I haven't looked at git-series yet (I actually have a git "series" alias > to list the current commits against a parent/tracking branch) > but StGit does remember the series history. It stores all the past states > of a series in a .stgit branch and you can inspect the > changes, get unlimited undo/redo, even show a diff of diffs for > a given patch. > > > Note that git-series doesn't provide a quilt-style push/pop workflow, > > with applied and unapplied patches; it just looks at HEAD. > > Even though I'm the original author of StGit, I find myself using it less > and less these days as I'm busier integrating others' patches than > creating my own series from scratch. But what I miss though in plain git is the patch "pop" functionality. At > some point I may add a 'git stash head' feature to git which > would stash away the HEAD commit without losing its content (and > the corresponding 'git stash apply' restoring the original commit). This will stash an arbitrary commit: #!/bin/sh commit="${1}"; git tag -f stash ${commit} git rebase --onto ${commit}~1 ${commit} and git cherry-pick stash will unstash > -- > Catalin > _______________________________________________ > Ksummit-discuss mailing list > Ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ksummit-discuss