From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752301AbcHHKib (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Aug 2016 06:38:31 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:53483 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751979AbcHHKi3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Aug 2016 06:38:29 -0400 Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2016 12:38:24 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Steve Muckle , Linux PM list , Srinivas Pandruvada , Viresh Kumar , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Juri Lelli , Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/7] cpufreq / sched: Make schedutil access utilization data directly Message-ID: <20160808103824.GB6879@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <3752826.3sXAQIvcIA@vostro.rjw.lan> <9887668.FEg7fVruKQ@vostro.rjw.lan> <20160801192850.GX19455@graphite.smuckle.net> <5472075.XX6bKsbQPI@vostro.rjw.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5472075.XX6bKsbQPI@vostro.rjw.lan> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 01:46:51AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Monday, August 01, 2016 12:28:50 PM Steve Muckle wrote: > > Can the DL policy be left as-is and discussed/modified in a separate > > series? > > No problem with that as far as I'm concerned, but in that case it won't be > a Peter's patch any more. :-) No problem from my side though. I just did them together as an illustration of the benefit etc.. Rip it up as you see fit ;-)