From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753193AbcHPHdq (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Aug 2016 03:33:46 -0400 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([192.55.52.115]:16093 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752223AbcHPHdo (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Aug 2016 03:33:44 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,529,1464678000"; d="scan'208";a="1036277139" Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 09:33:36 +0200 From: Vincent =?iso-8859-1?Q?Stehl=E9?= To: Richard Weinberger Cc: "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" , LKML , Artem Bityutskiy Subject: Re: [PATCH] UBIFS: fix assertion in layout_in_gaps() Message-ID: <20160816073336.GA24318@jazz.nc.intel.com> Mail-Followup-To: Richard Weinberger , "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" , LKML , Artem Bityutskiy References: <1471008390-19227-1-git-send-email-vincent.stehle@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 11:00:33AM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote: .. > Good catch! Did you hit this assertion or was it found by review? > I bet the latter since it is here since ever and given the wrongness > it is unlikely to trigger. Dear Richard, It was found with a static checker and later review to confirm. Best regards, Vincent.