From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1768349AbcHROle (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 18 Aug 2016 10:41:34 -0400
Received: from smtprelay0184.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.184]:54416 "EHLO
	smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1766766AbcHROla (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 18 Aug 2016 10:41:30 -0400
X-Session-Marker: 726F737465647440676F6F646D69732E6F7267
X-Spam-Summary: 2,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,rostedt@goodmis.org,:::::::::::::::::::::::::::,RULES_HIT:41:355:379:541:599:800:960:973:988:989:1183:1260:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1359:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1541:1593:1594:1711:1730:1747:1777:1792:2198:2199:2393:2553:2559:2562:2911:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3353:3622:3865:3866:3867:3868:3870:3871:3872:3873:3874:4423:4425:4823:5007:6261:6742:7514:7875:7903:9040:10004:10400:10848:10967:11232:11658:11914:12517:12519:12663:12740:13069:13146:13230:13311:13357:13439:14096:14097:14181:14659:14721:14777:21080:21326:21433:30012:30022:30054:30083:30090:30091,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:fn,MSBL:0,DNSBL:none,Custom_rules:0:0:0,LFtime:5,LUA_SUMMARY:none
X-HE-Tag: linen94_295650e7c9754
X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 2489
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 10:41:22 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, x86@kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>,
        Nilay Vaish <nilayvaish@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/57] x86/dumpstack: rewrite x86 stack dump code
Message-ID: <20160818104122.64265424@gandalf.local.home>
In-Reply-To: <20160818143136.wogmldvu7tysmd5q@treble>
References: <cover.1471525031.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com>
	<20160818132507.GD22490@lerouge>
	<20160818133935.GA3737@gmail.com>
	<20160818143136.wogmldvu7tysmd5q@treble>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.2 (GTK+ 2.24.30; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, 18 Aug 2016 09:31:36 -0500
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 03:39:35PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > 
> > * Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> wrote:
> >   
> > > > Josh Poimboeuf (57):  
> > > 
> > > I am personally unable to review a 57 patches series.
> > > 
> > > Any chance you could split it into self-contained steps? In general doing so 
> > > increase the chances for reviews, accelerate merging, improve maintainance...  
> > 
> > Yes, please!
> > 
> > Series of no more than 4-6 patches, ordered in a logical fasion from lowest risk / 
> > simplest towards highest risk / most complex.  
> 
> You're right, that would be better.  My apologies for spamming.  It
> started with "only" 19 patches in v1 and then quickly got out of hand.
> 
> I may split it up something like this:

This looks fine. My wife came down to complain to me that my tablet was
"popping" too much. (it pops for every email I get).

But don't send these all at once. Send one series out and focus on
that, then when that is all set, then work on the next series.

-- Steve