From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753985AbcHRNjm (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 18 Aug 2016 09:39:42 -0400
Received: from mail-wm0-f67.google.com ([74.125.82.67]:35816 "EHLO
	mail-wm0-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1753849AbcHRNjj (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 18 Aug 2016 09:39:39 -0400
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 15:39:35 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, x86@kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>, Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>,
        Nilay Vaish <nilayvaish@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/57] x86/dumpstack: rewrite x86 stack dump code
Message-ID: <20160818133935.GA3737@gmail.com>
References: <cover.1471525031.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com>
 <20160818132507.GD22490@lerouge>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20160818132507.GD22490@lerouge>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


* Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> wrote:

> > Josh Poimboeuf (57):
> 
> I am personally unable to review a 57 patches series.
> 
> Any chance you could split it into self-contained steps? In general doing so 
> increase the chances for reviews, accelerate merging, improve maintainance...

Yes, please!

Series of no more than 4-6 patches, ordered in a logical fasion from lowest risk / 
simplest towards highest risk / most complex.

Thanks,

	Ingo