From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754972AbcHSBSz (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Aug 2016 21:18:55 -0400 Received: from mail-oi0-f66.google.com ([209.85.218.66]:33935 "EHLO mail-oi0-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754179AbcHSBSw (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Aug 2016 21:18:52 -0400 Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 14:20:02 -0500 From: Rob Herring To: Lee Jones Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@stlinux.com, patrice.chotard@st.com, thierry.reding@gmail.com, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 17/17] dt-bindings: pwm: sti: Update DT bindings with recent changes Message-ID: <20160818192002.GA26225@rob-hp-laptop> References: <20160816093508.28307-1-lee.jones@linaro.org> <20160816093508.28307-18-lee.jones@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160816093508.28307-18-lee.jones@linaro.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 10:35:08AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > We're renaming the 'st,pwm-num-chan' binding to 'st,pwm-num-devs' to > be more inline with the naming conventions of the subsystem. Where > we used to treat each line as a channel, the PWM convention is to > describe them as devices. This is out of date now. Otherwise, the binding looks fine. > The second documentation adaption entails adding support for PWM > capture devices. A new clock is required as well as an IRQ line. > We're also adding a new property similar to the one described > above, but for capture channels. Typically, there will be less > capture channels than PWM-out, since all channels have the latter > capability, but only some have capture support. > > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-st.txt | 8 +++++--- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rob Herring Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 17/17] dt-bindings: pwm: sti: Update DT bindings with recent changes Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 14:20:02 -0500 Message-ID: <20160818192002.GA26225@rob-hp-laptop> References: <20160816093508.28307-1-lee.jones@linaro.org> <20160816093508.28307-18-lee.jones@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160816093508.28307-18-lee.jones@linaro.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Lee Jones Cc: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, kernel@stlinux.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, patrice.chotard@st.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, thierry.reding@gmail.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 10:35:08AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > We're renaming the 'st,pwm-num-chan' binding to 'st,pwm-num-devs' to > be more inline with the naming conventions of the subsystem. Where > we used to treat each line as a channel, the PWM convention is to > describe them as devices. This is out of date now. Otherwise, the binding looks fine. > The second documentation adaption entails adding support for PWM > capture devices. A new clock is required as well as an IRQ line. > We're also adding a new property similar to the one described > above, but for capture channels. Typically, there will be less > capture channels than PWM-out, since all channels have the latter > capability, but only some have capture support. > > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-st.txt | 8 +++++--- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: robh@kernel.org (Rob Herring) Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 14:20:02 -0500 Subject: [PATCH v4 17/17] dt-bindings: pwm: sti: Update DT bindings with recent changes In-Reply-To: <20160816093508.28307-18-lee.jones@linaro.org> References: <20160816093508.28307-1-lee.jones@linaro.org> <20160816093508.28307-18-lee.jones@linaro.org> Message-ID: <20160818192002.GA26225@rob-hp-laptop> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 10:35:08AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > We're renaming the 'st,pwm-num-chan' binding to 'st,pwm-num-devs' to > be more inline with the naming conventions of the subsystem. Where > we used to treat each line as a channel, the PWM convention is to > describe them as devices. This is out of date now. Otherwise, the binding looks fine. > The second documentation adaption entails adding support for PWM > capture devices. A new clock is required as well as an IRQ line. > We're also adding a new property similar to the one described > above, but for capture channels. Typically, there will be less > capture channels than PWM-out, since all channels have the latter > capability, but only some have capture support. > > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-st.txt | 8 +++++--- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)