From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: kbeldan@baylibre.com (Karl Beldan) Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 17:42:38 +0000 Subject: [PATCH v3 0/4] Add DT support for NAND to LCDK via ti-aemif In-Reply-To: <234aeb42-4373-a996-c782-1dac95838d07@ti.com> References: <20160816223338.20776-1-kbeldan@baylibre.com> <20160819134602.GA3056@gobelin> <234aeb42-4373-a996-c782-1dac95838d07@ti.com> Message-ID: <20160819174238.GA7526@gobelin> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 07:40:35PM +0530, Sekhar Nori wrote: > On Friday 19 August 2016 07:16 PM, Karl Beldan wrote: > > > Sure, I'll add it to the series when resending. > > I just pushed an updated master branch on my tree with all the patches > accepted so far. Can you please rebase against that branch while sending? > I rebased and sent [1] [PATCH] ARM: davinci_all_defconfig: Enable some UBI modules [2] [PATCH v2] ARM: davinci: da8xx-dt: Add ti-aemif lookup for clock matching Unfortunately while automating I messed up and sent both twice and [2] as a reply to [1] while I intended to send them separately and preferably [1] after [2]. You've already applied patches 2/4 and 3/4 of the original series while 3/4 depends on [2] and 4/4 is on hold because of the ECC issue. Please tell me if you want to deal with these patches or prefer a resend. Regards, Karl