From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Benjamin Marzinski" Subject: Re: fedora/rh: is hp_tur checker still needed? Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 23:01:32 -0500 Message-ID: <20160825040132.GW26062@octiron.msp.redhat.com> References: <859fb60d-10ee-00e8-b4d9-53ff237c2336@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <859fb60d-10ee-00e8-b4d9-53ff237c2336@gmail.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com To: Xose Vazquez Perez Cc: device-mapper development List-Id: dm-devel.ids On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 03:12:21PM +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: > Hi Benjamin, > > Doc says: > On some storage devices, if a LUN is deleted from an existing multipathd > device, and a new LUN is presented to the host, it may end up with the > same LUN ID and name as the old LUN. In this case, multipath will assume > that this is the old LUN and belongs to the existing multipath device. > This cause cause corruption. A new path checker "hp_tur" has been added > that verifies the WWID of the LUN when it checks the path, to avoid this > problem. > Code: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/device-mapper-multipath.git/plain/0007-RH-add-hp_tur-checker.patch No. Nothing has used it for a while. -Ben