From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S932602AbcH2IFc (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Mon, 29 Aug 2016 04:05:32 -0400
Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([78.46.96.112]:51317 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1756125AbcH2IFa (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 29 Aug 2016 04:05:30 -0400
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 10:05:30 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
Cc: York Sun <york.sun@nxp.com>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        yangbo lu <yangbo.lu@freescale.com>, Liu Gang <Gang.Liu@nxp.com>,
        morbidrsa@gmail.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@freescale.com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>, stuart.yoder@nxp.com,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, oss@buserror.net,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Rajesh Bhagat <rajesh.bhagat@freescale.com>,
        Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>, Mingkai Hu <Mingkai.Hu@freescale.com>,
        Li Yang <leoli@freescale.com>, Yuan Yao <yao.yuan@nxp.com>,
        linux-edac@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch v4 9/9] arm64: Update device tree for Layerscape SoCs
Message-ID: <20160829080530.GA25468@nazgul.tnic>
References: <1470780000-16750-1-git-send-email-york.sun@nxp.com>
 <20160812091354.GB333@nazgul.tnic>
 <20160829063448.GA32489@tiger>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20160829063448.GA32489@tiger>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 02:34:48PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> Is it mandatory to have DTS changes go with driver part altogether?

Yes, because the EDAC driver needs them to even load properly.

> Otherwise, I prefer to have them go through separate tree.

Any particular reason why you prefer that?

We've been doing this for other ARM EDAC drivers already and there were
no issues whatsoever.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--

From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: bp@alien8.de (Borislav Petkov)
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 10:05:30 +0200
Subject: [Patch v4 9/9] arm64: Update device tree for Layerscape SoCs
In-Reply-To: <20160829063448.GA32489@tiger>
References: <1470780000-16750-1-git-send-email-york.sun@nxp.com>
 <20160812091354.GB333@nazgul.tnic> <20160829063448.GA32489@tiger>
Message-ID: <20160829080530.GA25468@nazgul.tnic>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 02:34:48PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> Is it mandatory to have DTS changes go with driver part altogether?

Yes, because the EDAC driver needs them to even load properly.

> Otherwise, I prefer to have them go through separate tree.

Any particular reason why you prefer that?

We've been doing this for other ARM EDAC drivers already and there were
no issues whatsoever.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--