From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965099AbcHaQCr (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Aug 2016 12:02:47 -0400 Received: from mezzanine.sirena.org.uk ([106.187.55.193]:59660 "EHLO mezzanine.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933887AbcHaQCm (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Aug 2016 12:02:42 -0400 Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 17:02:27 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Lee Jones Cc: Tero Kristo , Dave Gerlach , Keerthy , tony@atomide.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, russ.dill@ti.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, linux@armlinux.org.uk Message-ID: <20160831160227.GC5967@sirena.org.uk> References: <1466412218-5906-8-git-send-email-j-keerthy@ti.com> <20160831083114.GP10121@dell> <20160831114105.GH3950@sirena.org.uk> <20160831145018.GO9415@dell> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="yLVHuoLXiP9kZBkt" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160831145018.GO9415@dell> X-Cookie: Beware of computerized fortune-tellers! User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2a01:348:6:8808:fab::3 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk Subject: Re: Applied "mfd: tps65218: add version check to the PMIC probe" to the regulator tree X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mezzanine.sirena.org.uk); Unknown failure Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --yLVHuoLXiP9kZBkt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 03:50:18PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > On Wed, 31 Aug 2016, Mark Brown wrote: > > You acked it, that's saying that you're OK with the patch and are > > expecting someone else to apply it. > No it doesn't, you made that up. :) > I know when you and some others Ack a patch, that's what you mean, but That's the standard meaning I'm afraid, you're going to confuse people if you do that. I'd suggest using a different tag if you want to do this, probably make one up. > you've been working with me for long enough to know that's not what I > mean when I Ack a patch. I do it as an indication that I've reviewed > the patch and I'm happy with it. Most MFD patches that have Sorry but I'm not actually reading most of these threads, I've not seen this behaviour. Mostly I just look at the relevant patches, especially on the resends where presumably this has been happening. Not sure why I even saw the ack here, perhaps I had some question about the versioning API. =20 --yLVHuoLXiP9kZBkt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJXxv+SAAoJECTWi3JdVIfQKiIH/0rnRQv6rDU62UAAqTB54sBW idoIwLfXZ4NkZAghe1CLjU8QzYTMduYMZYryDd+XJ0IMLob331dKtTJccUo+03ZV 0vQ9zI+XPEtwXuQ9riecqWWfamawY59Sw1hVK5zn3Xfaa4UNGIv3ZfAJGSP0bhFv K/Pm8cTmih7V/WVfZjnSyvgJ+t9yhBX69rpkb2tfVSwmaHZFdyrc8SsA5PGj75aP WjzhOQz/rviK8BWqA2GQkwNy6E7PagFcU/7r1//Bfq/4LUCsxgI82eWTknmqzVhv Gkyg8Vly9DEPQdyUxBjt61zd/MBul7WU7keuXzf5u+sLJ5OnDir4qxvQ9RaJzR4= =2bBe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --yLVHuoLXiP9kZBkt-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: Applied "mfd: tps65218: add version check to the PMIC probe" to the regulator tree Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 17:02:27 +0100 Message-ID: <20160831160227.GC5967@sirena.org.uk> References: <1466412218-5906-8-git-send-email-j-keerthy@ti.com> <20160831083114.GP10121@dell> <20160831114105.GH3950@sirena.org.uk> <20160831145018.GO9415@dell> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="yLVHuoLXiP9kZBkt" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160831145018.GO9415@dell> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Lee Jones Cc: Tero Kristo , Dave Gerlach , Keerthy , tony-4v6yS6AI5VpBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org, devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, russ.dill-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org, robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org, linux-I+IVW8TIWO2tmTQ+vhA3Yw@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org --yLVHuoLXiP9kZBkt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 03:50:18PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > On Wed, 31 Aug 2016, Mark Brown wrote: > > You acked it, that's saying that you're OK with the patch and are > > expecting someone else to apply it. > No it doesn't, you made that up. :) > I know when you and some others Ack a patch, that's what you mean, but That's the standard meaning I'm afraid, you're going to confuse people if you do that. I'd suggest using a different tag if you want to do this, probably make one up. > you've been working with me for long enough to know that's not what I > mean when I Ack a patch. I do it as an indication that I've reviewed > the patch and I'm happy with it. Most MFD patches that have Sorry but I'm not actually reading most of these threads, I've not seen this behaviour. Mostly I just look at the relevant patches, especially on the resends where presumably this has been happening. Not sure why I even saw the ack here, perhaps I had some question about the versioning API. =20 --yLVHuoLXiP9kZBkt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJXxv+SAAoJECTWi3JdVIfQKiIH/0rnRQv6rDU62UAAqTB54sBW idoIwLfXZ4NkZAghe1CLjU8QzYTMduYMZYryDd+XJ0IMLob331dKtTJccUo+03ZV 0vQ9zI+XPEtwXuQ9riecqWWfamawY59Sw1hVK5zn3Xfaa4UNGIv3ZfAJGSP0bhFv K/Pm8cTmih7V/WVfZjnSyvgJ+t9yhBX69rpkb2tfVSwmaHZFdyrc8SsA5PGj75aP WjzhOQz/rviK8BWqA2GQkwNy6E7PagFcU/7r1//Bfq/4LUCsxgI82eWTknmqzVhv Gkyg8Vly9DEPQdyUxBjt61zd/MBul7WU7keuXzf5u+sLJ5OnDir4qxvQ9RaJzR4= =2bBe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --yLVHuoLXiP9kZBkt-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html