From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1754585AbcIANOp (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Thu, 1 Sep 2016 09:14:45 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:48688 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1752247AbcIANOm (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 1 Sep 2016 09:14:42 -0400
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 08:13:24 -0500
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>, Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
        Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>,
        Nilay Vaish <nilayvaish@gmail.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] x86/dumpstack: more stack dump improvements
Message-ID: <20160901131324.ebh4mnqduo7ahyco@treble>
References: <cover.1472057064.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <cover.1472057064.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0.1 (2016-04-01)
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.32]); Thu, 01 Sep 2016 13:13:26 +0000 (UTC)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 11:50:13AM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> Some more preparatory patches for the new x86 unwinder (though these
> generally stand alone as improvements in their own right).

Ingo, would you be willing to take this series?  There have been no
objections other than Linus's orthogonal comment.

-- 
Josh