Hi, On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 02:28:54PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > > + be0: display-backend@01e60000 { > > + compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-a33-display-backend"; > > + reg = <0x01e60000 0x10000>; > > Please also list the interrupt, even though we don't use it yet. > The manual says it's 127 - 32 = 95. Yep, you're right. > > + sat0: sat@01e80000 { > > + compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-a33-sat"; > > + reg = <0x01e80000 0x1000>; > > + clocks = <&ccu CLK_BUS_SAT>; > > + resets = <&ccu RST_BUS_SAT>; > > + > > + ports { > > + #address-cells = <1>; > > + #size-cells = <0>; > > + > > + sat0_in: port@0 { > > + #address-cells = <1>; > > + #size-cells = <0>; > > + reg = <0>; > > + > > + sat0_in_fe0: endpoint@0 { > > + reg = <0>; > > + remote-endpoint = <&fe0_out_sat0>; > > + }; > > + }; > > + > > + sat0_out: port@1 { > > + #address-cells = <1>; > > + #size-cells = <0>; > > + reg = <1>; > > + > > + sat0_out_be0: endpoint@0 { > > + reg = <0>; > > + remote-endpoint = <&be0_in_sat0>; > > + }; > > + }; > > I'm worried about the representation here. > > In the user manuals, the SAT is shown as part of the BE. Look at it > this way: if it did come before the BE and is independent, we > shouldn't have to bring the SAT out of reset for simplefb to work. Indeed. > For comparison, a similar function unit called "CMU" found on the > other post-sun6i SoCs has the same function description as SAT on > the A33. It uses the reserved registers at the beginning of the BE > address space. Hmm, ok, so you would essentially, merge the backend and sat nodes? That wouldn't be very hard to do, i'll do it. Thanks! Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com