From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S934199AbcIFNg1 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Tue, 6 Sep 2016 09:36:27 -0400
Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:48677 "EHLO
        bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1751258AbcIFNgZ (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 6 Sep 2016 09:36:25 -0400
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2016 06:36:18 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>, Ming Lin <ming.l@ssi.samsung.com>,
        Jay Sternberg <jay.e.sternberg@intel.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
        Jay Freyensee <james_p_freyensee@linux.intel.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme: add back dependency on CONFIG_BLOCK
Message-ID: <20160906133618.GA30548@infradead.org>
References: <20160906125827.1595094-1-arnd@arndb.de>
 <d7099c1b-730f-1617-f683-2447bedd3e6d@grimberg.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <d7099c1b-730f-1617-f683-2447bedd3e6d@grimberg.me>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27)
X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from <hch@infradead.org> by bombadil.infradead.org. See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 04:09:26PM +0300, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> Thanks Arnd, queued for the next round of rc fixes.
> 
> With a slight modification to the component in the subject line
> (nvme-rdma).

Shouldn't we just have a if BLOCK around all the entries in the Kconfig?

From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: hch@infradead.org (Christoph Hellwig)
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2016 06:36:18 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] nvme: add back dependency on CONFIG_BLOCK
In-Reply-To: <d7099c1b-730f-1617-f683-2447bedd3e6d@grimberg.me>
References: <20160906125827.1595094-1-arnd@arndb.de>
 <d7099c1b-730f-1617-f683-2447bedd3e6d@grimberg.me>
Message-ID: <20160906133618.GA30548@infradead.org>

On Tue, Sep 06, 2016@04:09:26PM +0300, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> Thanks Arnd, queued for the next round of rc fixes.
> 
> With a slight modification to the component in the subject line
> (nvme-rdma).

Shouldn't we just have a if BLOCK around all the entries in the Kconfig?