From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 279107CA0 for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2016 10:09:08 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFF338F8033 for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2016 08:09:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id NsqDBJsLOyPzqJng (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 06 Sep 2016 08:09:06 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2016 08:09:02 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/71] xfs: add refcount btree operations Message-ID: <20160906150902.GH24287@infradead.org> References: <147216791538.867.12413509832420924168.stgit@birch.djwong.org> <147216800795.867.8161276170370290222.stgit@birch.djwong.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <147216800795.867.8161276170370290222.stgit@birch.djwong.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: "Darrick J. Wong" Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 04:33:28PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > Implement the generic btree operations required to manipulate refcount > btree blocks. The implementation is similar to the bmapbt, though it > will only allocate and free blocks from the AG. > > v2: Remove init_rec_from_key since we no longer need it, and add > tracepoints when refcount btree operations fail. > > Since the refcount root and level fields are separate from the > existing roots and levels array, they need a separate logging flag. > > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong > [hch: fix logging of AGF refcount btree fields] > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig No need to mention this little fixlet from ages ago. More importantly: why is this a separate patch from the remaining "meat" in xfs_refcount_btree.c _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs