From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoffer Dall Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] ARM: KVM: Get ready to use vgic-v3 Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2016 18:49:26 +0200 Message-ID: <20160906164926.GE23592@cbox> References: <1471344418-19568-1-git-send-email-vladimir.murzin@arm.com> <1471344418-19568-7-git-send-email-vladimir.murzin@arm.com> <20160905112920.GK26366@cbox> <57CEC0C7.6090603@arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B36040B58 for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2016 12:38:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ULlkoMekoPnh for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2016 12:38:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail-wm0-f43.google.com (mail-wm0-f43.google.com [74.125.82.43]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7CCB407AD for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2016 12:38:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-wm0-f43.google.com with SMTP id i204so44681149wma.0 for ; Tue, 06 Sep 2016 09:46:58 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <57CEC0C7.6090603@arm.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Sender: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu To: Vladimir Murzin Cc: marc.zyngier@arm.com, andre.przywara@arm.com, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 02:12:39PM +0100, Vladimir Murzin wrote: > On 05/09/16 12:29, Christoffer Dall wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 11:46:57AM +0100, Vladimir Murzin wrote: > >> We need to take care we have everything vgic-v3 expects from us before > >> a quantum leap: > >> - provide required macros via uapi.h > >> - handle access to GICv3 cpu interface from the guest > >> - provide mapping between arm64 version of GICv3 cpu registers and arm's > >> > >> The later is handled via redirection of read{write}_gicreg() and > > > > 'The latter' > > > > Fixed. > > >> required mainly because 64-bit wide ICH_LR is split in two 32-bit > >> halves (ICH_LR and ICH_LRC) accessed independently. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Murzin > >> --- > >> arch/arm/include/asm/arch_gicv3.h | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_asm.h | 3 ++ > >> arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 7 ++++ > >> arch/arm/kvm/coproc.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++ > >> 4 files changed, 110 insertions(+) > >> > >> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch_gicv3.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch_gicv3.h > >> index af25c32..f93f6bd 100644 > >> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch_gicv3.h > >> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch_gicv3.h > >> @@ -96,6 +96,70 @@ > >> #define ICH_AP1R2 __AP1Rx(2) > >> #define ICH_AP1R3 __AP1Rx(3) > >> > >> +/* A32-to-A64 mappings used by VGIC save/restore */ > >> + > >> +#define CPUIF_MAP(a32, a64) \ > >> +static inline void write_ ## a64(u32 val) \ > >> +{ \ > >> + write_sysreg(val, a32); \ > >> +} \ > >> +static inline u32 read_ ## a64(void) \ > >> +{ \ > >> + return read_sysreg(a32); \ > >> +} \ > >> + > >> +#define CPUIF_MAP_LO_HI(a32lo, a32hi, a64) \ > >> +static inline void write_ ## a64(u64 val) \ > >> +{ \ > >> + write_sysreg((u32)val, a32lo); \ > >> + write_sysreg((u32)(val >> 32), a32hi); \ > >> +} \ > >> +static inline u64 read_ ## a64(void) \ > >> +{ \ > >> + u64 val = read_sysreg(a32lo); \ > >> + \ > >> + val |= (u64)read_sysreg(a32hi) << 32; \ > >> + \ > >> + return val; \ > >> +} > > > > I really don't like that we're defining new functions using a macro. > > I can expand it manually if think it'd look better. I can also suggest > to prefix generated functions with underscore. > I understand the desire to avoid manually writing all these static functions. > > > > Why can't you just do whatever series of actions and/or type > > conversions using familiar tricks such as 'do { foo; } while (0);' > > and so on ? > > Probably, because I don't how to apply these tricks here to keep > virt/kvm/arm/hyp/vgic-v3-sr.c unchanged. If you have something > particular in mind, please, suggest! > Hmmm, no I see now what you're doing, by defining all those static inlines, you're effectively creating a mapping with a function for each register mapping the 32-bit to the 64-bit accessors. I guess this makes sense and that is probably why you call this _MAP. I wish there were a good/better/cleaner way to do this, but I can live with it. Thanks, -Christoffer > > > >> + > >> +CPUIF_MAP(ICH_HCR, ICH_HCR_EL2) > >> +CPUIF_MAP(ICH_VTR, ICH_VTR_EL2) > >> +CPUIF_MAP(ICH_MISR, ICH_MISR_EL2) > >> +CPUIF_MAP(ICH_EISR, ICH_EISR_EL2) > >> +CPUIF_MAP(ICH_ELSR, ICH_ELSR_EL2) > >> +CPUIF_MAP(ICH_VMCR, ICH_VMCR_EL2) > >> +CPUIF_MAP(ICH_AP0R3, ICH_AP0R3_EL2) > >> +CPUIF_MAP(ICH_AP0R2, ICH_AP0R2_EL2) > >> +CPUIF_MAP(ICH_AP0R1, ICH_AP0R1_EL2) > >> +CPUIF_MAP(ICH_AP0R0, ICH_AP0R0_EL2) > >> +CPUIF_MAP(ICH_AP1R3, ICH_AP1R3_EL2) > >> +CPUIF_MAP(ICH_AP1R2, ICH_AP1R2_EL2) > >> +CPUIF_MAP(ICH_AP1R1, ICH_AP1R1_EL2) > >> +CPUIF_MAP(ICH_AP1R0, ICH_AP1R0_EL2) > >> +CPUIF_MAP(ICC_HSRE, ICC_SRE_EL2) > >> +CPUIF_MAP(ICC_SRE, ICC_SRE_EL1) > >> + > >> +CPUIF_MAP_LO_HI(ICH_LR15, ICH_LRC15, ICH_LR15_EL2) > >> +CPUIF_MAP_LO_HI(ICH_LR14, ICH_LRC14, ICH_LR14_EL2) > >> +CPUIF_MAP_LO_HI(ICH_LR13, ICH_LRC13, ICH_LR13_EL2) > >> +CPUIF_MAP_LO_HI(ICH_LR12, ICH_LRC12, ICH_LR12_EL2) > >> +CPUIF_MAP_LO_HI(ICH_LR11, ICH_LRC11, ICH_LR11_EL2) > >> +CPUIF_MAP_LO_HI(ICH_LR10, ICH_LRC10, ICH_LR10_EL2) > >> +CPUIF_MAP_LO_HI(ICH_LR9, ICH_LRC9, ICH_LR9_EL2) > >> +CPUIF_MAP_LO_HI(ICH_LR8, ICH_LRC8, ICH_LR8_EL2) > >> +CPUIF_MAP_LO_HI(ICH_LR7, ICH_LRC7, ICH_LR7_EL2) > >> +CPUIF_MAP_LO_HI(ICH_LR6, ICH_LRC6, ICH_LR6_EL2) > >> +CPUIF_MAP_LO_HI(ICH_LR5, ICH_LRC5, ICH_LR5_EL2) > >> +CPUIF_MAP_LO_HI(ICH_LR4, ICH_LRC4, ICH_LR4_EL2) > >> +CPUIF_MAP_LO_HI(ICH_LR3, ICH_LRC3, ICH_LR3_EL2) > >> +CPUIF_MAP_LO_HI(ICH_LR2, ICH_LRC2, ICH_LR2_EL2) > >> +CPUIF_MAP_LO_HI(ICH_LR1, ICH_LRC1, ICH_LR1_EL2) > >> +CPUIF_MAP_LO_HI(ICH_LR0, ICH_LRC0, ICH_LR0_EL2) > >> + > >> +#define read_gicreg(r) read_##r() > >> +#define write_gicreg(v, r) write_##r(v) > >> + > >> /* Low-level accessors */ > >> > >> static inline void gic_write_eoir(u32 irq) > >> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_asm.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_asm.h > >> index 58faff5..dfccf94 100644 > >> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_asm.h > >> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_asm.h > >> @@ -68,6 +68,9 @@ extern int __kvm_vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); > >> extern void __init_stage2_translation(void); > >> > >> extern void __kvm_hyp_reset(unsigned long); > >> + > >> +extern u64 __vgic_v3_get_ich_vtr_el2(void); > >> +extern void __vgic_v3_init_lrs(void); > >> #endif > >> > >> #endif /* __ARM_KVM_ASM_H__ */ > >> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h > >> index a2b3eb3..b38c10c 100644 > >> --- a/arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h > >> +++ b/arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h > >> @@ -84,6 +84,13 @@ struct kvm_regs { > >> #define KVM_VGIC_V2_DIST_SIZE 0x1000 > >> #define KVM_VGIC_V2_CPU_SIZE 0x2000 > >> > >> +/* Supported VGICv3 address types */ > >> +#define KVM_VGIC_V3_ADDR_TYPE_DIST 2 > >> +#define KVM_VGIC_V3_ADDR_TYPE_REDIST 3 > >> + > >> +#define KVM_VGIC_V3_DIST_SIZE SZ_64K > >> +#define KVM_VGIC_V3_REDIST_SIZE (2 * SZ_64K) > >> + > >> #define KVM_ARM_VCPU_POWER_OFF 0 /* CPU is started in OFF state */ > >> #define KVM_ARM_VCPU_PSCI_0_2 1 /* CPU uses PSCI v0.2 */ > >> > >> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/coproc.c b/arch/arm/kvm/coproc.c > >> index 1bb2b79..10c0244 100644 > >> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/coproc.c > >> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/coproc.c > >> @@ -228,6 +228,36 @@ bool access_vm_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, > >> return true; > >> } > >> > >> +static bool access_gic_sgi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, > >> + const struct coproc_params *p, > >> + const struct coproc_reg *r) > >> +{ > >> + u64 reg; > >> + > >> + if (!p->is_write) > >> + return read_from_write_only(vcpu, p); > >> + > >> + reg = *vcpu_reg(vcpu, p->Rt2); > >> + reg <<= 32; > >> + reg |= *vcpu_reg(vcpu, p->Rt1) ; > >> + > >> + vgic_v3_dispatch_sgi(vcpu, reg); > >> + > >> + return true; > >> +} > >> + > >> +static bool access_gic_sre(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, > >> + const struct coproc_params *p, > >> + const struct coproc_reg *r) > >> +{ > >> + if (p->is_write) > >> + return ignore_write(vcpu, p); > >> + > >> + *vcpu_reg(vcpu, p->Rt1) = vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v3.vgic_sre; > >> + > >> + return true; > >> +} > >> + > >> /* > >> * We could trap ID_DFR0 and tell the guest we don't support performance > >> * monitoring. Unfortunately the patch to make the kernel check ID_DFR0 was > >> @@ -361,10 +391,16 @@ static const struct coproc_reg cp15_regs[] = { > >> { CRn(10), CRm( 3), Op1( 0), Op2( 1), is32, > >> access_vm_reg, reset_unknown, c10_AMAIR1}, > >> > >> + /* ICC_SGI1R */ > >> + { CRm64(12), Op1( 0), is64, access_gic_sgi}, > >> + > >> /* VBAR: swapped by interrupt.S. */ > >> { CRn(12), CRm( 0), Op1( 0), Op2( 0), is32, > >> NULL, reset_val, c12_VBAR, 0x00000000 }, > >> > >> + /* ICC_SRE */ > >> + { CRn(12), CRm(12), Op1( 0), Op2(5), is32, access_gic_sre }, > >> + > >> /* CONTEXTIDR/TPIDRURW/TPIDRURO/TPIDRPRW: swapped by interrupt.S. */ > >> { CRn(13), CRm( 0), Op1( 0), Op2( 1), is32, > >> access_vm_reg, reset_val, c13_CID, 0x00000000 }, > >> -- > >> 1.7.9.5 > >> > > > > Otherwise this looks correct. > > Thanks > Vladimir > > > > > Thanks, > > -Christoffer > > > > > From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: christoffer.dall@linaro.org (Christoffer Dall) Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2016 18:49:26 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v2 6/7] ARM: KVM: Get ready to use vgic-v3 In-Reply-To: <57CEC0C7.6090603@arm.com> References: <1471344418-19568-1-git-send-email-vladimir.murzin@arm.com> <1471344418-19568-7-git-send-email-vladimir.murzin@arm.com> <20160905112920.GK26366@cbox> <57CEC0C7.6090603@arm.com> Message-ID: <20160906164926.GE23592@cbox> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 02:12:39PM +0100, Vladimir Murzin wrote: > On 05/09/16 12:29, Christoffer Dall wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 11:46:57AM +0100, Vladimir Murzin wrote: > >> We need to take care we have everything vgic-v3 expects from us before > >> a quantum leap: > >> - provide required macros via uapi.h > >> - handle access to GICv3 cpu interface from the guest > >> - provide mapping between arm64 version of GICv3 cpu registers and arm's > >> > >> The later is handled via redirection of read{write}_gicreg() and > > > > 'The latter' > > > > Fixed. > > >> required mainly because 64-bit wide ICH_LR is split in two 32-bit > >> halves (ICH_LR and ICH_LRC) accessed independently. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Murzin > >> --- > >> arch/arm/include/asm/arch_gicv3.h | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_asm.h | 3 ++ > >> arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 7 ++++ > >> arch/arm/kvm/coproc.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++ > >> 4 files changed, 110 insertions(+) > >> > >> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch_gicv3.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch_gicv3.h > >> index af25c32..f93f6bd 100644 > >> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch_gicv3.h > >> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch_gicv3.h > >> @@ -96,6 +96,70 @@ > >> #define ICH_AP1R2 __AP1Rx(2) > >> #define ICH_AP1R3 __AP1Rx(3) > >> > >> +/* A32-to-A64 mappings used by VGIC save/restore */ > >> + > >> +#define CPUIF_MAP(a32, a64) \ > >> +static inline void write_ ## a64(u32 val) \ > >> +{ \ > >> + write_sysreg(val, a32); \ > >> +} \ > >> +static inline u32 read_ ## a64(void) \ > >> +{ \ > >> + return read_sysreg(a32); \ > >> +} \ > >> + > >> +#define CPUIF_MAP_LO_HI(a32lo, a32hi, a64) \ > >> +static inline void write_ ## a64(u64 val) \ > >> +{ \ > >> + write_sysreg((u32)val, a32lo); \ > >> + write_sysreg((u32)(val >> 32), a32hi); \ > >> +} \ > >> +static inline u64 read_ ## a64(void) \ > >> +{ \ > >> + u64 val = read_sysreg(a32lo); \ > >> + \ > >> + val |= (u64)read_sysreg(a32hi) << 32; \ > >> + \ > >> + return val; \ > >> +} > > > > I really don't like that we're defining new functions using a macro. > > I can expand it manually if think it'd look better. I can also suggest > to prefix generated functions with underscore. > I understand the desire to avoid manually writing all these static functions. > > > > Why can't you just do whatever series of actions and/or type > > conversions using familiar tricks such as 'do { foo; } while (0);' > > and so on ? > > Probably, because I don't how to apply these tricks here to keep > virt/kvm/arm/hyp/vgic-v3-sr.c unchanged. If you have something > particular in mind, please, suggest! > Hmmm, no I see now what you're doing, by defining all those static inlines, you're effectively creating a mapping with a function for each register mapping the 32-bit to the 64-bit accessors. I guess this makes sense and that is probably why you call this _MAP. I wish there were a good/better/cleaner way to do this, but I can live with it. Thanks, -Christoffer > > > >> + > >> +CPUIF_MAP(ICH_HCR, ICH_HCR_EL2) > >> +CPUIF_MAP(ICH_VTR, ICH_VTR_EL2) > >> +CPUIF_MAP(ICH_MISR, ICH_MISR_EL2) > >> +CPUIF_MAP(ICH_EISR, ICH_EISR_EL2) > >> +CPUIF_MAP(ICH_ELSR, ICH_ELSR_EL2) > >> +CPUIF_MAP(ICH_VMCR, ICH_VMCR_EL2) > >> +CPUIF_MAP(ICH_AP0R3, ICH_AP0R3_EL2) > >> +CPUIF_MAP(ICH_AP0R2, ICH_AP0R2_EL2) > >> +CPUIF_MAP(ICH_AP0R1, ICH_AP0R1_EL2) > >> +CPUIF_MAP(ICH_AP0R0, ICH_AP0R0_EL2) > >> +CPUIF_MAP(ICH_AP1R3, ICH_AP1R3_EL2) > >> +CPUIF_MAP(ICH_AP1R2, ICH_AP1R2_EL2) > >> +CPUIF_MAP(ICH_AP1R1, ICH_AP1R1_EL2) > >> +CPUIF_MAP(ICH_AP1R0, ICH_AP1R0_EL2) > >> +CPUIF_MAP(ICC_HSRE, ICC_SRE_EL2) > >> +CPUIF_MAP(ICC_SRE, ICC_SRE_EL1) > >> + > >> +CPUIF_MAP_LO_HI(ICH_LR15, ICH_LRC15, ICH_LR15_EL2) > >> +CPUIF_MAP_LO_HI(ICH_LR14, ICH_LRC14, ICH_LR14_EL2) > >> +CPUIF_MAP_LO_HI(ICH_LR13, ICH_LRC13, ICH_LR13_EL2) > >> +CPUIF_MAP_LO_HI(ICH_LR12, ICH_LRC12, ICH_LR12_EL2) > >> +CPUIF_MAP_LO_HI(ICH_LR11, ICH_LRC11, ICH_LR11_EL2) > >> +CPUIF_MAP_LO_HI(ICH_LR10, ICH_LRC10, ICH_LR10_EL2) > >> +CPUIF_MAP_LO_HI(ICH_LR9, ICH_LRC9, ICH_LR9_EL2) > >> +CPUIF_MAP_LO_HI(ICH_LR8, ICH_LRC8, ICH_LR8_EL2) > >> +CPUIF_MAP_LO_HI(ICH_LR7, ICH_LRC7, ICH_LR7_EL2) > >> +CPUIF_MAP_LO_HI(ICH_LR6, ICH_LRC6, ICH_LR6_EL2) > >> +CPUIF_MAP_LO_HI(ICH_LR5, ICH_LRC5, ICH_LR5_EL2) > >> +CPUIF_MAP_LO_HI(ICH_LR4, ICH_LRC4, ICH_LR4_EL2) > >> +CPUIF_MAP_LO_HI(ICH_LR3, ICH_LRC3, ICH_LR3_EL2) > >> +CPUIF_MAP_LO_HI(ICH_LR2, ICH_LRC2, ICH_LR2_EL2) > >> +CPUIF_MAP_LO_HI(ICH_LR1, ICH_LRC1, ICH_LR1_EL2) > >> +CPUIF_MAP_LO_HI(ICH_LR0, ICH_LRC0, ICH_LR0_EL2) > >> + > >> +#define read_gicreg(r) read_##r() > >> +#define write_gicreg(v, r) write_##r(v) > >> + > >> /* Low-level accessors */ > >> > >> static inline void gic_write_eoir(u32 irq) > >> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_asm.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_asm.h > >> index 58faff5..dfccf94 100644 > >> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_asm.h > >> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_asm.h > >> @@ -68,6 +68,9 @@ extern int __kvm_vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); > >> extern void __init_stage2_translation(void); > >> > >> extern void __kvm_hyp_reset(unsigned long); > >> + > >> +extern u64 __vgic_v3_get_ich_vtr_el2(void); > >> +extern void __vgic_v3_init_lrs(void); > >> #endif > >> > >> #endif /* __ARM_KVM_ASM_H__ */ > >> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h > >> index a2b3eb3..b38c10c 100644 > >> --- a/arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h > >> +++ b/arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h > >> @@ -84,6 +84,13 @@ struct kvm_regs { > >> #define KVM_VGIC_V2_DIST_SIZE 0x1000 > >> #define KVM_VGIC_V2_CPU_SIZE 0x2000 > >> > >> +/* Supported VGICv3 address types */ > >> +#define KVM_VGIC_V3_ADDR_TYPE_DIST 2 > >> +#define KVM_VGIC_V3_ADDR_TYPE_REDIST 3 > >> + > >> +#define KVM_VGIC_V3_DIST_SIZE SZ_64K > >> +#define KVM_VGIC_V3_REDIST_SIZE (2 * SZ_64K) > >> + > >> #define KVM_ARM_VCPU_POWER_OFF 0 /* CPU is started in OFF state */ > >> #define KVM_ARM_VCPU_PSCI_0_2 1 /* CPU uses PSCI v0.2 */ > >> > >> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/coproc.c b/arch/arm/kvm/coproc.c > >> index 1bb2b79..10c0244 100644 > >> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/coproc.c > >> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/coproc.c > >> @@ -228,6 +228,36 @@ bool access_vm_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, > >> return true; > >> } > >> > >> +static bool access_gic_sgi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, > >> + const struct coproc_params *p, > >> + const struct coproc_reg *r) > >> +{ > >> + u64 reg; > >> + > >> + if (!p->is_write) > >> + return read_from_write_only(vcpu, p); > >> + > >> + reg = *vcpu_reg(vcpu, p->Rt2); > >> + reg <<= 32; > >> + reg |= *vcpu_reg(vcpu, p->Rt1) ; > >> + > >> + vgic_v3_dispatch_sgi(vcpu, reg); > >> + > >> + return true; > >> +} > >> + > >> +static bool access_gic_sre(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, > >> + const struct coproc_params *p, > >> + const struct coproc_reg *r) > >> +{ > >> + if (p->is_write) > >> + return ignore_write(vcpu, p); > >> + > >> + *vcpu_reg(vcpu, p->Rt1) = vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v3.vgic_sre; > >> + > >> + return true; > >> +} > >> + > >> /* > >> * We could trap ID_DFR0 and tell the guest we don't support performance > >> * monitoring. Unfortunately the patch to make the kernel check ID_DFR0 was > >> @@ -361,10 +391,16 @@ static const struct coproc_reg cp15_regs[] = { > >> { CRn(10), CRm( 3), Op1( 0), Op2( 1), is32, > >> access_vm_reg, reset_unknown, c10_AMAIR1}, > >> > >> + /* ICC_SGI1R */ > >> + { CRm64(12), Op1( 0), is64, access_gic_sgi}, > >> + > >> /* VBAR: swapped by interrupt.S. */ > >> { CRn(12), CRm( 0), Op1( 0), Op2( 0), is32, > >> NULL, reset_val, c12_VBAR, 0x00000000 }, > >> > >> + /* ICC_SRE */ > >> + { CRn(12), CRm(12), Op1( 0), Op2(5), is32, access_gic_sre }, > >> + > >> /* CONTEXTIDR/TPIDRURW/TPIDRURO/TPIDRPRW: swapped by interrupt.S. */ > >> { CRn(13), CRm( 0), Op1( 0), Op2( 1), is32, > >> access_vm_reg, reset_val, c13_CID, 0x00000000 }, > >> -- > >> 1.7.9.5 > >> > > > > Otherwise this looks correct. > > Thanks > Vladimir > > > > > Thanks, > > -Christoffer > > > > >