From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: xfrm: Change u32 sysctl entries to use proc_douintvec Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2016 23:18:19 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20160907.231819.779556681260847633.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1473206971-20131-1-git-send-email-subashab@codeaurora.org> <20160907.172518.871134561524524971.davem@davemloft.net> <20160908055117.GM31137@gauss.secunet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: subashab@codeaurora.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: steffen.klassert@secunet.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([184.105.139.130]:54482 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751346AbcIHG1Y (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Sep 2016 02:27:24 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20160908055117.GM31137@gauss.secunet.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Steffen Klassert Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 07:51:17 +0200 > On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 05:25:18PM -0700, David Miller wrote: >> From: Subash Abhinov Kasiviswanathan >> Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2016 18:09:31 -0600 >> >> > proc_dointvec limits the values to INT_MAX in u32 sysctl entries. >> > proc_douintvec allows to write upto UINT_MAX. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Subash Abhinov Kasiviswanathan >> >> I am assuming Steffen will pick this up. > > proc_douintvec is not in the ipsec-next tree. The ipsec-next > tree is currently based on net-next from Aug 9. The patch > that introduces proc_douintvec came in on Aug 25. > > I can take it after the pull request for ipsec-next, that > I plan to do today. Alternatively, you can take it directly > into net-next. It does not interfere anything that I > have in ipsec-next. In case you want to take it directly: > > Acked-by: Steffen Klassert Ok, I've applied it to net-next then, thanks!