From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754480AbcILQff (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Sep 2016 12:35:35 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([78.46.96.112]:40725 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752675AbcILQfb (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Sep 2016 12:35:31 -0400 Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 18:35:26 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: Tom Lendacky Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Radim =?utf-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= , Arnd Bergmann , Jonathan Corbet , Matt Fleming , Joerg Roedel , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Andrey Ryabinin , Ingo Molnar , Andy Lutomirski , "H. Peter Anvin" , Paolo Bonzini , Alexander Potapenko , Thomas Gleixner , Dmitry Vyukov Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 11/20] mm: Access BOOT related data in the clear Message-ID: <20160912163526.tdmdssawmole723n@pd.tnic> References: <20160822223529.29880.50884.stgit@tlendack-t1.amdoffice.net> <20160822223738.29880.6909.stgit@tlendack-t1.amdoffice.net> <20160909163814.sgsi2jlxlshskt5c@pd.tnic> <6431e761-a4c8-c9bb-1352-6d66672200fd@amd.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6431e761-a4c8-c9bb-1352-6d66672200fd@amd.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/ (1.7.0) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 10:14:59AM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote: > I did run checkpatch against everything, but was always under the > assumption that I shouldn't change existing warnings/errors like this. > If it's considered ok since I'm touching that line of code then I'll > take care of those situations. Yeah, normally we fix sensible checkpatch warnings/errors when we touch the code so please do correct them :-) Thanks. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 11/20] mm: Access BOOT related data in the clear Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 18:35:26 +0200 Message-ID: <20160912163526.tdmdssawmole723n@pd.tnic> References: <20160822223529.29880.50884.stgit@tlendack-t1.amdoffice.net> <20160822223738.29880.6909.stgit@tlendack-t1.amdoffice.net> <20160909163814.sgsi2jlxlshskt5c@pd.tnic> <6431e761-a4c8-c9bb-1352-6d66672200fd@amd.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6431e761-a4c8-c9bb-1352-6d66672200fd-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: iommu-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: iommu-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: Tom Lendacky Cc: linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, kvm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Radim =?utf-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= , Matt Fleming , x86-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org, Alexander Potapenko , "H. Peter Anvin" , linux-arch-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Jonathan Corbet , linux-doc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, kasan-dev-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org, Ingo Molnar , Andrey Ryabinin , Arnd Bergmann , Andy Lutomirski , Thomas Gleixner , Dmitry Vyukov , linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org, Paolo Bonzini List-Id: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 10:14:59AM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote: > I did run checkpatch against everything, but was always under the > assumption that I shouldn't change existing warnings/errors like this. > If it's considered ok since I'm touching that line of code then I'll > take care of those situations. Yeah, normally we fix sensible checkpatch warnings/errors when we touch the code so please do correct them :-) Thanks. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.